Posted on 12/04/2012 3:35:55 PM PST by Colofornian
Closing the book after reading, "Brigham Young: Pioneer Prophet," the new biography by George Mason University religious studies professor John G. Turner, published by Belknap Press of Harvard University, causes some swirling emotions for this Latter-day Saint reader. From reading Turners fantastic and it is by far the best that has been written of Youngs life biography, its easy for a faithful Mormon to agree that God called Young to the task of moving 20,000-plus Mormons across the plains to Utah territory and over a generation-plus, to set up hundreds of Mormon settlements. No man in U.S. history was ever that successful in those endeavors. On the other hand, while admiring Youngs organizational skills, I dont much care for Brigham Young the man.
Turners biography portrays an often unpleasant man, with a foul mouth his preferred cuss word was "shit" and a spiteful, vengeful nature. He had a caustic sense of humor, which perhaps mitigates some of his casual comments that seemed to support violence. He ruled the Salt Lake Valley as an absolute dictator, and harbored longtime grudges against apostles who dared to criticize his particular beliefs, such as blood atonement, the Adam-God doctrine, and the United Order. While no evidence exists that Young ordered the Mountain Meadows Massacre, his messages to Native Americans that they could steal from non-Mormon settlers, the atmosphere of settler-animus that pervaded 1857 Utah, and Youngs successful efforts to stymie an initial investigation into the massacre, harm the image of the LDS Churchs second modern-day prophet.
Indeed, Youngs caustic tongue also inflamed a Mormon bishop to castrate a petty criminal, a Logan member. Rather than feel sympathy for the man or his mother, Young protected the ecclesiastical leader who had ordered it. And, reading accounts of murders of non-Mormons by LDS thugs Porter Rockwell and William Hickman, it seems plausible to theorize that Young ordered those deaths.
However, Turners book overall is not a negative portrayal of Young. It is another example of grizzly bear truth, where a great mans life is revealed, with strengths and weaknesses, talents and faults included. The book is on the shelves at Deseret Book, and thats appropriate because it does justice in recounting the life of the Wests most prominent 19th century colonizer. Turner describes Youngs hardscrabble existence in early 18th century New England, his strained relationship with his father, and his early religious skepticism that was finally counteracted by Joseph Smiths new religion, Mormonism.
Before the mid-1840s, Brigham Young was known for his compassion and openness as a Mormon apostle. Turner recounts his tender, love-filled letters to his wife, Mary Angell, and the biography includes accounts of his compassionate tenure as a leader to the Mormons in England. But the murder of the Joseph Smith, the continued harassment of Nauvoo Mormons afterward, and, as important, the internal dissent that swirled within the LDS Church prior to Smiths murder, all that changed Young. He appears to have turned into a man, a leader, determined to never let that happen again. Young mercilessly abused the LDS apostles both privately and publicly.
Youngs CEO-type behavior, though, achieved its goals. No disagreeing members of the LDS hierarchy were able to achieve the success of the Law brothers, in Nauvoo. Youngs hammering of the Saints in Utah, his public denunciations and calls for repentance, kept the Utah Mormons united in their distrust of outside influences and retained their faith in unity.
His strong opposition to mining, for example, kept Utah free of non-Mormon influences for as long as Young could manage it.
Young never forgave what he perceived as disrespect, and late in his life arranged the apostles hierarchy so that Orson Pratt could not become church president. It was motivated by retained anger over Pratts efforts at independence. Young never admitted that he made mistakes. The handcart fiasco was the fault of Franklin Richards and John Taylor; the failure to enact a United Order was the fault of Erastus Snow. Private gestures of compassion and charity to apostles, severely chastened by Young, served to partially mitigate this routine abuse. Young also provided himself a great deal of wealth and luxury, while relegating many of his followers to relative poverty. He tolerated no criticism of this perceived inequality.
Young demands respect despite his human weaknesses. More than even Joseph Smith, he is responsible for the survival of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. His shrewd leadership, along with help from the canny, non-Mormon lobbyist, Thomas Kane, managed to keep him as the main source of power in the Utah territory for much longer than anyone would have anticipated. Young was able to manipulate political events, wars, the seasons, weak-willed political appointees, Native American unrest, and petitions for statehood to consistently survive virtually every imbroglio with the federal government or U.S. Army. Turner recounts many incidents of Young surviving as Utahs leader while "gentile" nemesis after nemesis left Utah as grumbling failures.
When the railroad connected Utah with the nation, Youngs power slowly decreased the last decade of his life. Perhaps to cheat the spectre of death, Young took a few young wives. He tried to re-energize support for two doctrines he had long espoused, the Adam-God doctrine and the United Order. Those efforts though were lackluster. Still revered by members, Young seemed a calmer, or perhaps just exhausted, lion. One of his final acts was to dedicate the St. George Temple. Characteristically, he criticized an apostle while doing so.
Brigham Young was a great man. I revere him as a prophet. He was also a man of his times, who carried the savagery and bigotry of that era. Many of his most egregious acts can be explained, and even perhaps excused, by the understanding that he felt himself to be in a war. He believed that his existence, and that of his Gospel, was in danger. That he died as leader of the Utah Mormons was his final victory, and final sacrifice for Joseph Smith.
dgibson@standard.net. This column was published at Nothing Standard blogs at http://blogs.standard.net/the-political-surf/2012/10/01/brigham-young-biography-portrays-a-great-leader-and-an-unpleasant-man/
No, actually you...
(a) showed that the reformers & other church leaders' need for a Savior;
(b) and that NONE of them were divine -- unlike the temple Mormons...who claim to be "gods in embryos"...
The issue isn't simply -- as you try to reduce it down to...who has sins and who has flaws & who doesn't.
If that is your weak argument, then Jesus Christ stands in one corner & we ALL...past & present...fall down on the other side...
(So, in case you couldn't tell, HoTB, we're ALL united 'round THAT premise!!!)
I'll tell you what, tho: Show me ANY church leader -- Protestant, Orthodox, or Catholic -- who thought Adam was God.
I mean even Joseph Smith, the founding Mormon prophet, declared it was the FIRST principle of the Gospel to know the true character of God. And Brigham Young frankly flunked even Smith's declaration...(pretty tough to do when you examine how many false things Smith said about the Gospel!)
And why would you want to defend a man who thought that Adam was God?
(You're not some tucked-away 'Adam-is-God' disciple, are you?)
The Southern Baptist Convention.
Your statement was:
Baptist church apologizes for pro slavery position of 150 years ago.
My answer was and still is, that the S.B.C. (Southern Baptist Convention) doesn't speak for their member churches as all S.B.C. member Churches are autonomous.
Churches affiliated with the S.B.C. sometimes buy literature from them and support missionaries through them, there's no Pope there or leader of all the Baptist churches.
You chose to ignore that, I suspect you will do it again, as it doesn't fit your agenda.
You lack a bit of knowledge of MORMONism's history it seems...
Any place that a MORMON has the nerve to start spouting any of their HERESY will turn in to a BASH.
Bold
ANTIs
Spotlighting
Heresy
And since when are their panties available to non-mormons...
And since when are their panties available to non-mormons...
http://store.lds.org/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Category3_715839595_10557_21152_-1_Y_image_0
http://www.truthandgrace.com/Baptistonmormon.htm
Can I really ‘apologize’ for something I had no part in?
I can express regret for it; wish it never happened, say it was wrong; but...
“panties available to non-mormons”
Mormon church has never apologized for its racist doctrine (from the 1830s until 1978) preventing blacks from being able to take part in rituals that supposedly enable them to attain "exaltation", the mormon equivalent of salvation.
It mattereth not; as Mia Love is in the house!
"You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.
The first man that committed the odious crime of killing one of his brethren will be cursed the longest of any one of the children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings.
This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin. Trace mankind down to after the flood, and then another curse is pronounced upon the same race--that they should be the 'servant of servants', and they will be, until that curse is removed."
Brigham Young-President and second 'Prophet' of the Mormon Church, 1844-1877- Extract from Journal of Discourses.
Here are two examples from their 'other testament', the Book of Mormon.
2 Nephi 5: 21 'And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.'
Alma 3: 6 'And the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob and Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men.'
August 27, 1954 in an address at Brigham Young University (BYU), Mormon Elder, Mark E Peterson, in speaking to a convention of teachers of religion at the college level, said:
(Rosa Parks would have probably told Petersen under which wheel of the bus he should go sit.)
1967, (then) Mormon President Ezra Taft Benson said, "The Communist program for revolution in America has been in progress for many years and is far advanced. First of all, we must not place the blame upon Negroes. They are merely the unfortunate group that has been selected by professional Communist agitators to be used as the primary source of cannon fodder."
We are told that on June 8, 1978, it was 'revealed' to the then president, Spencer Kimball, that people of color could now gain entry into the priesthood. According to the church, Kimball spent many long hours petitioning God, begging him to give worthy black people the priesthood. God finally relented. |
Sometime before the 'revelation' came to chief 'Prophet' Spencer Kimball in June 1978, General Authority, Bruce R McConkie had said:
"The Blacks are denied the Priesthood; under no circumstances can they hold this delegation of authority from the Almighty.
The Negroes are not equal with other races where the receipt of certain blessings are concerned, particularly the priesthood and the temple blessings that flow there from, but this inequality is not of man's origin, it is the Lord's doings."
(Mormon Doctrine, pp. 526-527).
When Mormon 'Apostle' Mark E Petersen spoke on 'Race Problems- As they affect the Church' at the BYU campus in 1954, the following was also said:
"...if the negro accepts the gospel with real, sincere faith, and is really converted, to give him the blessings of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost, he can and will enter the celestial kingdom. He will go there as a servant, but he will get celestial glory."
When Mormon 'Prophet' and second President of the Church, Brigham Young, spoke in 1863 the following was also said:
"Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God is death on the spot. This will always be so."
(Journal of Discourses, Vo. 10, p. 110)
Yeah; Native Americans are althroughout the Book of MORMON; too.
I saw a striking contrast in the progress of the Indian people today ... they are fast becoming a white and delightsome people.... For years they have been growing delightsome, and they are now becoming white and delightsome, as they were promised.... The children in the home placement program in Utah are often lighter than their brothers and sisters in the hogans on the reservation.
At one meeting a father and mother and their sixteen-year-old daughter were present, the little member girl-sixteen-sitting between the dark father and mother, and it was evident she was several shades lighter than her parentson the same reservation, in the same hogan, subject to the same sun and wind and weather.... These young members of the Church are changing to whiteness and to delightsomeness.
One white elder jokingly said that he and his companion were donating blood regularly to the hospital in the hope that the process might be accelerated.
(Improvement Era, December 1960, pp.922-23). (p. 209)
Excellent point, and allow me to unpack that.
When I've mentioned what this Mormon door-shutting involved re: blacks, I've usually only mentioned things like not being allowed to be married in the temple; not being allowed to be part of male priesthood; but greyfoxx39 has hit upon the #1 attempted impact of Mormon racism/exclusion:
If you couldn't get a Mormon temple recommend, then per Mormonism, no exaltation. And no exaltation per Mormonism meant NO LIVING TOGETHER IN THE ETERNAL PRESENCE OF HEAVENLY FATHER.
So not only did Mormons teach/enact EARTHLY racism; but they intentionally sought to keep ALL blacks (& other "colors") out of God's eternal presence! And, as GF said, they have NEVER apologized for ANY of that!!!!
ALL: And here we have Hound of the Baskervilles being an advocate -- a "devil's advocate" -- for all of this!!!
What's your next online "project", HoTB...are ya gonna run interference for the KKK on ANOTHER forum???
My take is...yes...but with three key qualifiers:
#1...that what we're talking about is something egregious that occurred in the past...and not more on the side of the trivial;
and #2...That if, in some way, your identity is linked with that egregious activity;
and #3...That you've never publicly distanced yourself from it -- by labeling it as "wrong"; "in error"; "sinful"; "false prophecy," etc.
The fact is that the Mormon church HAS NEVER apologized for its exclusionary racism. They just changed it and attempted to "move on."
Nor has the Mormon church officially labeled Brigham Young as a "false prophet" for teaching it; and for teaching blood atonement and Adam-God. They just say it's not "official Mormon doctrine" and attempt to "move on."
The rock group Jethro Tull has a lyrical line that applies to what the Mormon church has done here: "Skating a-way...skating away...skating away...on the thin ice of a new day."
“Rode hard and put away wet” comes to mind...
?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.