Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveMSmith; daniel1212
What precisely do you find inconsistent about Joshua? It is a historical account of the Israelites moving into the territory prescribed by God. The problem the Israelites had was that a number of them still had not put away their idols.

The history of Israel is not unlike the Church. People still refuse to acknowledge or put away their idols. And, yes, the Israelites had all sorts of excuses as well. God allows our own cravings to be our own downfall.
45 posted on 11/30/2012 1:32:56 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HarleyD

The Bible Study covers the literal account in Joshua 3 and 4 as indicated in the OP. It’s not even clear how many times they crossed the Jordan. Point is, is there another way to read it?


46 posted on 11/30/2012 2:50:27 PM PST by DaveMSmith (Evil Comes from Falsity, So Share the Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; DaveMSmith
I fail to see any inconsistency. the city of Ur of the Chaldeans was a real city -- archaeologically proven

Ditto for Harran where Abram's family stayed, founded about 2300 BC, it was the CArrhae in Roman times where Rome suffered its first catastrophic defeat against the Parthians

This continued until the Mongol invasions -- 3000 years of history

I see no inconsistency there

The Jewish revolt of the Maccabees in Maccabees I and II -- I see no inconsistency there

what inconsistencies are you talking aobut?

277 posted on 12/04/2012 4:22:57 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson