Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DelphiUser; daniel1212
Speaking to another here, you say; Your grasp of Mormon doctrine, is nonexistent.

From your own homepage to which you have just recently on this thread linked to, in light of the above quote, your own [above] words seem to make of yourself master to Confucius, and daniel1212 a fish(?) for you quote there his teacher saying;

"You don't know that I don't know, you are not me."

The student thought for a moment, then bowed his agreement.

We are all men [of mankind] here, and not fish. Prove the allegation from official sources as to what is "Mormon doctrine", so that it may be more clearly determined what is grasped, and what is not.

242 posted on 11/29/2012 2:23:37 PM PST by BlueDragon (in essentials, unity; in doubtful matters, liberty; in all things, charity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: BlueDragon
Prove the allegation from official sources as to what is "Mormon doctrine", so that it may be more clearly determined what is grasped, and what is not.

The PD defense.

Paragon Defender would post this big list of LDS approved links and then tell everyone who wanted an answer to look it up for themselves.


Where can we find an 'OFFICIAL MORMON' teaching website??
Official sites are sites supported by LDS officials unless said official sites are considered unofficial by said officials.
 
At that point such sites are unofficial unless officially referenced for official purposes by officials who can do so officially.
 
This should not be misconstrued as an indication that official sites can be unofficially recognized as official nor should it be implied that unofficial sites cannot contain official information, but are not officially allowed to be offical despite their official contents due the their unofficialness.
 
Official sites will be official and recognized as official by officials of the LDS unless there is an official reason to mark them as unofficial either temporally or permanently, which would make the official content officially unofficial.
 
This is also not to imply that recognized sites, often used on FR by haters and bigots cannot contain official information, it just means that content, despite its official status, is no longer official and should be consider unofficial despite the same information being official on an official site elsewhere.
 
Even then the officialness my be amended due to the use of the unofficial information which may determine the officialness of anything be it official or unofficial depending on how and where it is used officially or unofficially.
I hope this clear things up for the lurkers out there.
The haters tend to make things complicated and confusing when it is all really quite crystal clear.
--Ejonesie22

284 posted on 11/29/2012 2:59:54 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson