Posted on 10/17/2012 5:32:20 PM PDT by ReligiousLibertyTV
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
[caption id="attachment_5052" align="alignright" width="215" caption=""The Water Torture. Facsimile of a Woodcut in J. Damhoudère's Praxis Rerum Criminalium: in 4to, Antwerp, 1556.""][/caption]
Pouring water over the covered face of an immobilized person is a brutal thing to do. The captive experiences severe pain and an overwhelming sensation of drowning. Some victims have even been known to break their bones as they struggle against the restraints.
But waterboarding is nothing compared with what American theologian Jonathan Edwards described God doing in his famous 1741 sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. This tortuous existence extends into eternity from the moment of death.
American evangelist Charles Spurgeon preached that, In hell there is no hope. They have not even the hope of dying; the hope of being annihilated. They are forever, forever, forever lost! On every chain in hell, there is written forever. In the fires there, blaze out the words, forever. Above their heads, they read, forever. Their eyes are galled and their hearts are pained with the thought that it is forever. Oh, if I could tell you tonight that hell would one day be burned out, and that those who were lost might be saved, there would be a jubilee in hell at the very thought of it. But it cannot be it is forever they are cast into the outer darkness.
From the perspective of Edwards and Spurgeon, the depths of hell are inversely proportionate to the heights of Heaven, as an all-powerful God gives eternal life to both the saved and the damned. While tears and sorrow will vanish from Heaven, the saved live with enduring knowledge and are even expected to rejoice that somewhere else concurrently living souls of the damned ranging from evil dictators to their unsaved neighbors day after day experiencing continuous ripping pain throughout eternity. An unrepentant child who died 1,000 years ago is being tortured that much longer than a recent mass murderer.
But is this really something that God would do? Does this belief influence how many Christians relate to the rest of the world?
In a 2008 USA Today poll, 57% of Southern evangelical respondents, and 48% of the general public, said that they believed torture can be justified to obtain information from suspected terrorists.
Why would be Christians be more willing to justify torture than the general public? It might go back to the doctrine of eternal torment in hell. Many believe that God will engage in torture day and night for eternity, so it would follow that Americans fighting for a righteous cause are justified in engaging in torture for short amounts of time to meet their objectives.
In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, on September 13, 2001, Ann Coulter, in an infamous column wrote, We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
In Catholic theology, torture isnt only reserved for the eternally lost. The church teaches that even the saved will suffer in purgatory for their sins until their debt of temporary punishment for venial sin has been paid through their own suffering.
But does suffering in hell appeal to the blood lust of an angry God, or do many Christians simply have the wrong picture of God? Where did this idea come from?
The doctrine of hell, as is commonly believed, has its origin in Plato and its application in the writings of Augustine who believed that God must punish, not only save, otherwise no human life, lived well or badly, made any ultimate difference. (See James V. Schall, "Regarding the Inattentiveness to Hell in Political Philosophy,"DivusThomas, (Piacenza), (#3-4, 1989), 273-79.)
Augustine believed that ultimately salvation from hell was the ultimate goal since ones destination and ones existence were the only things that were eternal. He divided society between the people who were saved in the City of God and the damned Earthly City. Since the two cities were intermingled on earth, The City of God must be fortified against the hellish Earthly City by an all-powerful totalitarian church that could police and protect the flock.
Because humanity set on a downward course through original sin, Augustine created the framework for an intermingling of church and state which would be necessary to ensure the survival of public moral virtues that would save as much of society as possible.
Invoking the doctrine of eternal hell, Augustine made an argument along the lines that if two men lived in a house which people knew with absolute certainty was about to fall down on them and kill them. If the men were warned of the impending danger and they refused, what should we do? Should we rescue them now, and reason with them later, or leave them to die? According to Augustine, we should rescue them now, for "I think that if we abstained from doing it, we should well deserve the charge of cruelty." (See Augustine, A Treatise Concerning the Correction of the Donatists; or Epistle CLXXXV).
[caption id="attachment_5041" align="alignright" width="200" caption="Religious punishment: Burning at the Stake"][/caption]
Accordingly, Augustine believed that it was the duty of the religious community to conduct investigations to locate heresy in Hell on Earth - Burning at the stakeorder to prevent the messages of heretics from corrupting the righteous. As a leading bishop, Augustine personally assisted in the interrogation, or inquisition of pagans, unorthodox Christians, and others he viewed as holding unacceptable beliefs. Ultimately, the Church took control over defining what was true doctrine and anybody who disagreed or preached contrary to these truths could be justifiably tortured or even killed in order to keep society free of harmful heresy and to fulfill the greater purpose.
So Christians acting with presumably good intentions resorted to techniques ranging from starvation to heaping burning coals on parts of the bodies of heretics. Then they started inventing ways to cause pain more efficiently while avoiding death in order to obtain confessions. Medieval torturers would tie the hands of the accused to pulleys on the ceiling and attach weights to the feet and ankles. They invented methods of stretching the joints of subjects to the point where bones were pulled from their sockets. They pulled at skin with pincers and thumbscrews and invented waterboarding, a technique first practiced by the Inquisition against Mennonite Christians in 1554.
Augustines beliefs in eternal hell, just war, and torture continue to have a tremendous influence on the modern world.
Augustine would consider this vein of thought pure heresy, but if Jesus Christ would really provide for eternal life both heaven and hell, maybe Christopher Hitchens was on to something when he titled his book, God is Not Great. If, as I type this, God is burning people at unquenchable stakes, then why would He care about the temporal suffering of a child who lost his pet dog or a father suffering the ravages of cancer? Even His suffering and death on the cross lasted less than a day how could a week, a year, a century, or eternity possibly be justified? How can a God like this possibly be love?
What a person believes about hell has a lot to do with what they think about God and how they believe people should be treated. As we enter times of social stress and ambiguity, when fundamental values are at stake, people of faith who doubt the power of God to change lives and believe that they are needed to fight the spiritual battle often engage a persecutory impulse, justified by a concept that whatever torture they mete out will be nothing to the fires of hell. In fact, for over a thousand years, Christians were religious persecutors.
Im not a theologian so this may not be complete but here is a basic overview of what the Bible says about heaven and hell.
And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. Revelation 21:4.
Thy mercy, O Lord, is in the heavens; and thy faithfulness reacheth unto the clouds.
Thy righteousness is like the great mountains; thy judgments are a great deep: O Lord, thou preservest man and beast.
How excellent is thy lovingkindness, O God! Therefore the children of men put their trust under the shadow of thy wings.
(Psalm 36:5-7)
###
For more information about the doctrine of hell, visit:
Hell Truth (Amazing Facts) - http://www.helltruth.com/
Brian P. Phillips - Annhilation or Everlasting Torment? Ministry Magazine (1996) http://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/1996/August/annihilation-or-endless-torment
Film: Hell and Mr. Fudge - http://hellandmrfudge.org/
Well... there were those Lamanites. They invaded Canada? Of course it helps if one can read the really old "Reformed Egyptian" texts (or be able to make it up on the spot...same difference).
Believe what you will about the Catholic Church, nevertheless there are thousands of Protestant sects each claiming to have the Truth. They vary theologically with each other from just a little, to quite a bit. These thousands of sects exist as the end result of the Reformation. I don’t think Martin Luther had that in mind, far from it, but it was inevitable as the break of day.
Now that would be the book of Mormon.
Martin Luther had no idea of setting up some kind of new denomination.
He wanted the Catholic church to get back to the truths of Scripture and they wouldn’t have anything to do with it so they very ungraciously uninvited him from membership in their church.
IOW, THEY ex-communicated him aka kicked him out.
While it is possible that some Protestant denominations do claim that they are the only way to God, by and large, if you read the statement of faith of virtually any of those churches, they all essentially say the same thing about salvation, that it is by grace, through faith in Christ. Not through membership in their church, not through baptism into it, not by works of righteousousness they have established must be done, not through jumpng through their ecclesiastical hoops, all as the Catholic church claims be done through it to earn salvation.
Precious few of those “Protestant sects” have the chutzpah to claim themsleves to be the sole means of salvation of mankind, as the Catholic church does.
Salvation is through a person, not a religion. It’s granted as a gift through forgiveness, not earned by works or suffering. Nothing can pay for sin but death, not religious duties, not acts of righteousness, not suffering.
The only thing that can pay for sin is death and Jesus paid that penalty for us so that through faith in His FINISHED work on the cross, by faith, we can partake in that forgivenss and eternal life. We are granted a pardon from the consequences of sin when we throw ourelves on the mercy of the court.
Suffering does not purify us from sin.
There is no payment for sin but death.
If you die with sin held to your account, you go to hell.
If that sin is forgiven, there is no sin held to your account and you go to heaven.
There is no purgatory.
Thanks for that enlightening bit of information. How deceitful interesting that that little tidbit on that connection was not mentioned until you exposed it.
I don’t kill loved ones.
Indeed. The notion of purgatory negates Christ’s sacrifice.
Who needs saving when everyone gets thoroughly scrubbed by spending 0% of eternity in a great washing machine for dirty souls?
So in the original line of thinking, you would rather your loved ones be tortured forever instead of being put out of their misery. Wow! Well, I don’t see that as love or mercy or honorable and definately not a characteristic of the God that I know.
Sin has consequences.
And yet I don’t encase my loved ones in bubble wrap.
I don,t know what Heaven or hell is and neither do any one else that is able to talk about it.
Oh, they have other fronts as well. Hope your health improves.
Suppose the person you love the most ends up in eternal torment. Could you be happy in Heaven knowing the suffering that lies ahead?
Absolutely, sin has consequences. I never said otherwise. You seem to be saying then, if God doesn’t torture the unbelievers forever, then the sinners get away scot free. I don’t buy that for an instant.
For one, Hell does exist for a while and I believe that our concept of time doesn’t exist in Hell. In other words a minute in Hell is probably like a thousand years. So, no one wants to be in Hell, even if just for a minute.
Two, imagine standing before God our Father and Creator, and seeing the hard proof of the glory that He is and the wonderful life you could have had with Him. Then seeing the proof of your life and where you rejected Christ. That moment, in and of itself will be crushing. THAT is what all courts here on Earth are actually working for, for the perpatrator to actually and fully realize what they have done and what they have lost. The Great White Throne Judgement will do that.
God is Just and God is Merciful. A just God has a complete and thorough judgement. A Merciful God doesn’t torture his creation forever.
You’re confusing consequences with retribution.
Feel free to explain to me what you mean. I’ll listen.
Consequences are natural.
Retribution is deliberate.
Ummm...ok. Now explain to me where those definitions show where I’ve gone off track.
The light of love burns and tortures those who have rejected love. God would be moved if He did anything other than love(’I am God, and I change not-Malachi 3:6.)
The hate comes from man’s free will to reject love ,not from God whom is perfection and love.
St. Isaac of Syria captures this so well along with many other Church Fathers
From St. Isaac of Syria
... those who find themselves in hell will be chastised by the scourge of love. How cruel and bitter this torment of love will be! For those who understand that they have sinned against love, undergo no greater suffering than those produced by the most fearful tortures. The sorrow which takes hold of the heart, which has sinned against love, is more piercing than any other pain. It is not right to say that the sinners in hell are deprived of the love of God ... But love acts in two ways, as suffering of the reproved, and as joy in the blessed! (St. Isaac of Syria, Mystic Treatises)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.