You do realize, don't you, that this Q goes both ways...thereby making it a 1-1 deadlock "tie" of sorts...which is horrendous "light" directed upon Mitt Romney...to actually "lose out" on a Constitutional matter to an out-and-out loser like Barack Obama.
With this Q you ask, DU, "Mitt" jumps out to a 1-0 lead on the Constitution.
But then the next Q comes -- equaling the Constitutional Qs at one apiece:
Is it your assertion, DU, that...
...it is better to have a first term president who...
...believes the Constitution's authors were “flawed” to the point of ...
...being "corrupt" professors of their faith;
...were 100% "apostate" before God/Jesus Christ;
...and that most of them embraced Christian sect creeds that Mitt and the rest of Mormon leadership regard as 100% an "abomination" before the Mormon god?
(I expect a direct answer to this question)
ALL: IT IS LDS OFFICIAL doctrine that the worldwide Christian denominations -- as they existed in the 18th century -- were in apostasy...
...that 100% of Christian sect creeds were regarded as an "abomination" -- per the first "vision" Joseph Smith received...
...and that "all" professors of the Christian faith were "corrupt"...citations found at post #84.
Were the founders to be still in their grave, they'd turn over at the nasty allegations made by Joseph Smith and the rest of Lds "prophets" and their disciples.
Colofornian, I hope you live along time, because I’d hate for you to die disappointed.
All your questions could have been asked by Candy Crawley.
“Hypothetically, Mitt, if you hit your wife, why wouldn’t you stop?”
LOL!
“If you want to repeal Obamacare, first you have to remove Obama” — Mitt Romeny
Delph