Is it your assertion that a man with similar views to even some of the founders is worse than what we have now?
Is it your assertion that it is better to have a second term resident who believes the constitution is a “flawed document” than a man who believes it's inspired?
Is it your assertion that a candidate who is head and shoulders over obama (weren't all our candidates?) Should be rejected solely on the basis of his religion?
Delph
Delph.
(I didn't know that some of the founders...
(a) thought they were "gods-in-embryo"...[DU, all -- for references as to what I'm talking about here, see post #30]
or (b) considered Christian sects to be apostate & filled with 100% "corrupt" professors & 100% "abominable" creeds...[For Lds "scriptures" referenced here, see post #84])
(Well, of course, Mitt Romney "a god of gods," is "head and shoulders" over a mere man, Barack. Is it your assertion that Mitt Romney is not a "god in embryo"??? ... I expect a direct answer to that question)
1. Most Mormons are not notorious pro-aborts who have made pro-abort actions/comments in 1994, 2002, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2012...like Mitt Romney has done.
2. Most Mormons -- anywhere from 80 to 85% of them -- are not temple Mormons -- like Mitt Romney is. Therefore, non-temple Mormons have ZILCHO claim to be or become "gods." The celestial kingdom, where the Mormon "gods" supposedly attain, is not for them.
And, for something completely different: Why Evangelicals Are Supporting Romney
You do realize, don't you, that this Q goes both ways...thereby making it a 1-1 deadlock "tie" of sorts...which is horrendous "light" directed upon Mitt Romney...to actually "lose out" on a Constitutional matter to an out-and-out loser like Barack Obama.
With this Q you ask, DU, "Mitt" jumps out to a 1-0 lead on the Constitution.
But then the next Q comes -- equaling the Constitutional Qs at one apiece:
Is it your assertion, DU, that...
...it is better to have a first term president who...
...believes the Constitution's authors were flawed to the point of ...
...being "corrupt" professors of their faith;
...were 100% "apostate" before God/Jesus Christ;
...and that most of them embraced Christian sect creeds that Mitt and the rest of Mormon leadership regard as 100% an "abomination" before the Mormon god?
(I expect a direct answer to this question)
ALL: IT IS LDS OFFICIAL doctrine that the worldwide Christian denominations -- as they existed in the 18th century -- were in apostasy...
...that 100% of Christian sect creeds were regarded as an "abomination" -- per the first "vision" Joseph Smith received...
...and that "all" professors of the Christian faith were "corrupt"...citations found at post #84.
Were the founders to be still in their grave, they'd turn over at the nasty allegations made by Joseph Smith and the rest of Lds "prophets" and their disciples.