[boatbums]

So, they’re not blowing smoke you just know more than them and therefore dismiss what they say. Thanks for making it clear that dismissing portions of Scripture you disagree with is your standard operating procedure.

Is it possible to have a conversation without the snarkiness on the side? If not, then I said what I wanted to say and it was clear enough that I neither dismissed Scripture nor "knew more than them". In fact, I believe ALL of what Scripture has to say because it alone is the infallible, divinely-inspired WORD of God, AKA...the Sword of the Spirit. Peace be with you.

[Rashputin]

I thought it was obvious and deliberate snarkiness to have not a single one of the Bible verses I posted directly addressed but see them all shoved aside. I guess when someone lays the snark on someone else they can expect to get it right back and no amount of their “is it possible” hokum amounts to anything but another brushing aside of the original point and verses.

have a nice day

[Cronos]

Scripture has to say because it alone is the infallible,

Rash, isn't it funny that people mix up English? Scripture is inerrant, i.e. without error. Scripture does not make a decision for you, it is not animate so is neither fallible nor the other way. A person can be fallible or not, an inanimate book isn't

The entire Word of God i.e. Jesus Christ is infallible and He grants us grace to infallibly follow His teachings.