Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
A calling up a monarch is a rare event in the life of a nation; most modern nations simply do not have a monarch and have nowhere to look for him. A monarchy rises organically and involves a bond that the monarch forms with his people, gradually. It is more like marriage than it is like governing.

Which is precisely the reason it is not there. There are very few, if no monarch currently which has this -- except perhaps the King of Thailand, the Emperor of Japan. the Archduke of luxembourg and the Archduke of Leichtenstein and to some extent the Queen of England (but not Charles...), the King of Belgium. The royalty of Scandanavia or the Netherlands does not have it, the Spanish monarchy to some extent has it as does the Prince of Monaco

55 posted on 09/12/2012 11:35:14 PM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

Yes. But just like sex education today teaches that marriage is a sex partnership in a shared household, so people of 19-20cc. have been taught that monarchy is about either dictatorship or decoration, but never a familial national bond. Pretty soon wives and husbands won’t be anywhere if we look for them, too.


56 posted on 09/13/2012 5:36:00 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson