Skip to comments.
What is Cardinal Dolan Up To?
Crisis Magazine ^
| August 6, 2012
| Charlie Spiering
Posted on 08/06/2012 1:33:31 PM PDT by NYer
What is Cardinal Dolan up to? According to reports, Dolan has extended an invitation to President Obama to the annual Al Smith dinner in New York City. The president, reportedly, has accepted.
Historically, the dinner is one of the most prestigious political events in New York City particularly during a presidential election year and candidates from both parties usually attend.
Known for its lighthearted political speeches, the major speakers deliver a series of self-deprecating jokes while ribbing their opponent at the same time. In October 2008, Senator John McCain and Senator Barack Obama both attended the dinner, accepting an invitation by Cardinal Egan of New York. During the dinner, Cardinal Eagan expressed his “delight” that Obama and McCain had attended, called them “outstanding exemplary Americans.”
But this year, some Catholics are surprised to hear that Archbishop Dolan had invited Obama, now that he is president. Should the Archbishop associate a fundraiser for Catholic Charities with a leader whose administration remains defiantly opposed to Church moral teachings?
It’s not unprecedented in a presidential election year for a candidate not to be invited. In 1996, Cardinal O’Connor did not invite President Clinton or Senator Dole to the dinner and, in 2004, neither Sen. John Kerry nor President Bush were invited.
Obama’s attendance at the dinner this year could be awkward, particularly since the Catholic Church’s relationship with Obama has been severely tested in the battle over his administration’s contraception coverage mandate issued by the Department of Health and Human Services.
According to Dolan, Obama assured that his administration would not “impede” the work of the Catholic Church. But once the mandate was issued, Catholic bishops publicly denounced the move, calling it a threat to religious freedom. What’s worse, administration officials who met with the bishops about the mandate refused to compromise in any meaningful way.
Dolan spoke out against the mandate, but was charitable when publicly speaking about Obama’s motives.
“I think I believe him when he says that he highly regards the work of the Church and does not want his administration to impede any of that,” Dolan said about the President on CBS during the controversy.
But Dolan insisted that the mandate is “straightjacketing,” “handcuffing” and “strangling” the Church and suggested that the members of Obama’s administration were either insensitive or ignorant of their concerns.
The Archdiocese of New York joined the University of Notre Dame and over 40 other religious organizations filing suit against the Obama administration to block the mandate. After announcing the lawsuit, Dolan issued a statement declaring that the issue was now up to the courts.
“We have tried negotiation with the administration and legislation with the Congressand will keep at itand theres still no fix,” he stated. “Time is running out, and our precious ministries and fundamental rights hang in the balance, so we have to resort to the courts now.
Additionally, Obama has further dismayed faithful Catholics after he expressed his support of same-sex marriage. Obama has also refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court.
In spite of their differences, Dolan appears willing to extend an olive branch to the president. Perhaps in this case, Dolan is conceding the political battle to be charitable and out of respect of the tradition of the dinner. The dinner raises millions for Catholic Charities each year and often serves as a symbol of bi-partisanship right before the presidential election.
Already, some Catholics are grumbling that the Archbishop’s public association with Obama may suggest a reluctance to oppose the president’s policies on abortion or religious freedom.
It has not been confirmed whether or not Republican candidate Mitt Romney has been invited, but presumably he will don a white tie and exchange jokes with the president and some of the wealthiest American citizens in New York City.
Dolan will also be given the opportunity to address both candidates in the national spotlight. While it is unlikely he will be able to change the president’s mind on these issues, he might see the dinner as an opportunity to defend religious liberty before the American public.
Hopefully the irony of Obama’s relationship with the Catholic Church will not be lost in the humorous tone of the event. It certainly won’t be lost on the media, who will frame it in the most dramatic terms.
Dolan is known for his sense of humor, which often characterizes his public remarks.
What weighs on me the most, Dolan explained in an interview in 2011, is the caricature of the Catholic Church as crabby, nay-saying, down in the dumps, discouraging, on the run. And Im thinking if there is anything that should be upbeat, affirming, positive, joyful, it should be people of faith.
Perhaps Dolan can be both gracious and critical while speaking about the president. The end result may teach Americans a significant lesson just before the presidential election.
TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: alsmith; alsmithdinner; bho2012; catholicvote; dolan; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: SumProVita
my good judgment is evidence enough for me to post my opinion.
too funny. as if a socialist catholic bishop is rare.
21
posted on
08/06/2012 4:59:20 PM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(At what point does an escalated effort to remove this traitor commence, and what form does it take?)
To: Alas Babylon!
Im afraid after four years of making some inroads on my (democratic) fellow Catholics, stuff like this just encourages them to stay in the democrat fold. Ive been hammering away on abortion, gay marriage and now these health care mandates, and all of a sudden we have the cardinal, one who led the charge, making nicey-nice. At best its confusing. At best. What is the good bishop up to? The Democratic machine in Washington plays for keeps. Has he taken on too much here? Does he think that he can run with the Democratic dogs?
22
posted on
08/06/2012 6:02:27 PM PDT
by
MarkBsnr
(I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
To: the invisib1e hand
Cardinal dolan is a socialist Perhaps it's someone like you that gives the socialist a pass and empowers them by weakness of argument of hiding behind a screename on free Republic ? Yet, you CRITICIZE someone like Cardinal Dolan who would deal with an enemy face to face like Our Blessed Lord did with the devil and with Pontius Pilate
It's obvious who is the weak in faith ,dear friend,...and it's not Cardinal Dolan, which leaves you know who
23
posted on
08/06/2012 6:34:10 PM PDT
by
stfassisi
((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
To: Alas Babylon!
At best its confusing. It's hard to see FReeper Catholics support Dolan's invitation -- do they not see the danger, the inherent conflict in what such a thing represents?
I wonder if it would be better to suspend the whole Al Smith dinner altogether, than to come to this sort of "compromise."
24
posted on
08/06/2012 6:42:32 PM PDT
by
workerbee
(June 28, 2012 -- 9/11 From Within)
To: NYer
If he holds the line, as I believe he will, good move.
The Church can’t be engaged in the life of the country as she opposed the mandate but not engaged when an opportunity to maintain a civil tone comes up. It will show that our position is rooted in reason rather than instinct.
25
posted on
08/06/2012 7:21:24 PM PDT
by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Church leaders are still deluding themselves into thinking they can negotiate/compromise with Obama or get him to back down. Anything but deal with the reality that he MUST be defeated.Oh, I don't think Cardinal Dolan is under any delusions about Obama's veracity. He knows now EXACTLY what he's dealing with.
26
posted on
08/06/2012 7:44:33 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: NYer
Yeah, I’m gonna trust Dolan on this one. I’m glad he’s where he is right now and I’m not inclined to second guess...
27
posted on
08/06/2012 8:19:46 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: the invisib1e hand
I agree with you. This invitation is a disgrace.
28
posted on
08/07/2012 4:00:41 AM PDT
by
PatriotGirl827
(Lord Jesus, direct my mind, possess my heart, transform my life)
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: the invisib1e hand
my good judgment is evidence enough for me
__________________________________
Lol! WHERE is the evidence of your *good* judgment?
30
posted on
08/07/2012 5:09:31 AM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. - Modified Descartes)
To: stfassisi
You’re right about one thing mr assissi: my faith in cardinal Dolan is nowhere near as strong as yours.
31
posted on
08/07/2012 5:11:09 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(At what point does an escalated effort to remove this traitor commence, and what form does it take?)
To: the invisib1e hand
Psychological projection?
;-o
32
posted on
08/07/2012 5:12:09 AM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. - Modified Descartes)
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: the invisib1e hand
It was wrong to label Cardinal Dolan as a socialist because he is meeting with a socialist.
Do you consider Ronald Reagan a communist because he met with Chinese President Li Xiannian? Hopefully you see the error of your labeling since you offered nothing other than unsubstantial rhetoric
35
posted on
08/07/2012 5:48:59 AM PDT
by
stfassisi
((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
To: NYer
The fact that Obama was invited is an advantage for the Obama campaign.
36
posted on
08/07/2012 6:58:44 AM PDT
by
ardara
To: SumProVita
The very topic of this thread is evidence, for starters. Then too are the cardinals own words: "The catholic church has been advocating for universal healthcare for nearly a hundred years!" "I'm a staunch union man!"
As I said, if there were a sworn statement, you'd deny it. And furthermore, an opinion is not the sort of thing for which a reasonable person demands "evidence" -- though I have given it, because it's so explicit. You could go read his blog for yourself.
And, yes, I've learned to trust my judgment, and hero-worship doesn't suit me, but you're on your own.
37
posted on
08/07/2012 10:34:29 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(At what point does an escalated effort to remove this traitor commence, and what form does it take?)
To: NYer
Perhaps the invitation is for the purpose of an Exorcism to drive out demons and evil spirits from our government.
38
posted on
08/07/2012 12:53:45 PM PDT
by
ADSUM
To: the invisib1e hand
The topic is *evidence?* Incredible...
I see that you can still offer nothing but a repetitive lack of substantiation.
39
posted on
08/07/2012 1:03:34 PM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. - Modified Descartes)
To: ADSUM
I am furious at the Catholic Church ( myself a Catholic) for not following up and messaging harder about the perils of the HHS mandate. The Church remains in the hands of men and certainly, as someone suggested above, Dolan - who initially messaged hard against BHO, has fallen asleep over the last several months. Something tells me Dolan has been given the same ‘compromise’ that was given to Justice Roberts.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson