“Deviations according to whom; scripture according to whom?”
God, of course. Who else gets to decide what truth is? Or which book is inspired?
BTW, don’t worry about the circle. Aristotle once said a circle in your logic is just fine, if the circle is small enough. Because then it’s an axiom. :)
You see your own error. No need for me to point it out.
If your way of reason + scripture worked = common doctrine, we wouldn’t be disagreeing.
Your position fails and has failed; it continues to fail. It is unreasonable to expect that which transcends reason to be known using reason alone.
It’s called a category error.
thanks for your reply.