Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer

You see your own error. No need for me to point it out.

If your way of reason + scripture worked = common doctrine, we wouldn’t be disagreeing.

Your position fails and has failed; it continues to fail. It is unreasonable to expect that which transcends reason to be known using reason alone.

It’s called a category error.

thanks for your reply.


376 posted on 06/29/2012 7:40:09 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

Error? You wish. Axioms are your friend. Only God can be infallible. That’s the premise of Sola Scriptura. We don’t trust man. We trust God.

Speaking of circular reasoning, you have not responded to my riddle yet. Is that because your circle is so much faultier than mine? You have no escape from an a priori exercise of private judgment. Offer a solution. I’m all ears.

“It is unreasonable to expect that which transcends reason to be known using reason alone.”

So why do you suppose God, who knew all this, gave us the Holy Spirit? Sola Scriptura reads its own Bible, and finds the need for God to help us. Just not some fallible guy in Italy with no valid claim to act as a substitute for the Holy Spirit (plus Scripture) in the life of a believer.

Nice try though.

Peace Bro.


377 posted on 06/29/2012 8:22:54 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson