No, it’s a recognition that rather than address the text or issue Catholics always try to deflect by using the “it comes from an anti Catholic site” as if simply because someone disagrees with you that statement is somehow going to hide the fact that Catholics can’t address the issue.
Give it up. The caps are used to point out the parts of the passage that we disagree with. It’s as simple as that. Also, Ligouri quotes those in agreement or in substantiation of what he is trying to get across. Ligouri certainly doesn’t disagree with the original quote, he is stressing it and using it as evidence. It’s still being used as a position the RCC holds is it not?
>> The question is when will you admit the source of the quote?<<
Ligouri.
>> That’s rich when it is becoming all the more obvious you lifted the quote from an anti-Catholic website.<<
LOL And all of those sites reference his book right? So it came from his book. Right?
You wrote:
“No, it’s a recognition that rather than address the text or issue Catholics always try to deflect by using the “it comes from an anti Catholic site” as if simply because someone disagrees with you that statement is somehow going to hide the fact that Catholics can’t address the issue.”
No. I showed that you claimed one thing (that you did not get it from a website), but that is not so. It clearly is from a website. Anti-Catholics, of course, apparently don’t care about their own dishonesty. I addressed what you posted and even discovered more than you probably wanted anyone to know.
“Give it up. The caps are used to point out the parts of the passage that we disagree with.”
In reality, some anti-Catholic took the quote out of context (i.e. didn’t mention who actually said the quotes: St. Anselm and Bernadine de Bustis; deceptively cut the quote) and added caps not in the original. You posted it here. Your buddy Lera claims you got it from a copy of the book he sent you. You contradict one another with your actions and words. Typical.
“It’s as simple as that.”
Yes it is simple. You got the quote from an anti-Catholic website. You apparently did not know the original context of the quotes.
“Also, Ligouri quotes those in agreement or in substantiation of what he is trying to get across. Ligouri certainly doesn’t disagree with the original quote, he is stressing it and using it as evidence. It’s still being used as a position the RCC holds is it not?”
What you posted is not what Ligouri wrote. If you posted it properly, there would be no problem.
“Ligouri.”
No, it was clearly an anti-Catholic website. That has already been shown. You had your chance. Now, nothing you post can be taken as veritable.
“LOL And all of those sites reference his book right? So it came from his book. Right?”
No. Those who added caps did not get it from his book. Neither did you. I don’t expect you to tell the truth about it. The evidence is plain.