Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Thank you for the responses. I think I may have gotten the answer to my question. I appreciate those who gave me some insight as to why.


119 posted on 03/17/2012 5:51:39 PM PDT by reaganaut ("I once was lost, but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut
I think I may have gotten the answer to my question.
Good, can you share with us what you think that answer may be?
124 posted on 03/17/2012 6:03:36 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut; narses

Thanks for your thoughtful question and also your desire for cordiality.

I wasnt going to respond after reading narses post to you. It was what I was going to say. I’d like to make it clear though, speaking for myself: This isn’t the “only” reason I believe Mary was a virgin for her entire life, but narses’ answer directly and I believe accurately answers your original question, that is, Why don’t Catholics change their mind on the issue? Why don’t we revisit it today? I would simply like to speak a bit more about that question, again to be sure the point I wanted to make would be clear.

Again, it’s Dogma, as narses said. For Catholics this is the equivalent of saying its a law of nature like gravity, or the spherical nature of the earth. So to ask, why don’t Catholics today at least look at the issue again, is the same as asking, why do t we reconsider whether or not the earth is round.

Just as the earth’s spherical nature is established fact (except for a few nitjobs of course) and thus it’s foolish to “reopen” that debate, it is equally foolish for a Catholic to reopen the issue of Mary’s perpetual virginity, because that too is established fact. A dogma is established fact, a settled debate in the Church. So this is why, even though we aren’t living in the Middle Ages, we won’t reopen the issue. Besides, as a side note, her perpetual virginity wasn’t made dogmatic until the 19th century, I believe. I could be wrong about that though.

The point I wanted to make though is in answer to your question as to why we dont revisit the issue today. The most basic response to that is, “We can’t”.


136 posted on 03/17/2012 7:01:29 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson