To: Colofornian
By all means, do go after Romney for his pro-choice record, for his liberal governing record, for his corporate welfare business record, etc.
But savaging someone for their religion doesn't wear well on our side IMO, even though I agree that his being Mormon indeed represents a liability for Romney in the general election that the Left will be all too happy to exploit.
9 posted on
03/12/2012 10:55:02 AM PDT by
Utmost Certainty
(Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
To: Utmost Certainty
But savaging someone for their religion doesn't wear well on our side IMO...(See post #8...you, too, were consistent in telling FREEPERS that in '08 with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright threads...??? Yes? No? Perhaps you can provide a link where you've given such a lecture to the Rev. Wright commentators)
11 posted on
03/12/2012 11:15:57 AM PDT by
Colofornian
( Tell us: Why do we want to vote for ONE socialist to defeat ANOTHER socialist again?)
To: Utmost Certainty
Romney is a liberal because he is a mormon not in spite of it. Romney is who is because of his mormonism.
It might serve you well to learn about mormonism before you dismiss it as a non issue to who Romney is.
17 posted on
03/12/2012 11:36:47 AM PDT by
svcw
(CLEAN WATER & Education http://www.longlostsis.com/PI/MayanHelp2012.html)
To: Utmost Certainty
But savaging someone for their religion doesn't wear well on our side IMO...DAMN!!
Why didn't the MORMONs think of this before NOW???
49 posted on
03/12/2012 1:13:08 PM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson