As I said in Ex it says that God spoke from the bush. Do you beleive that the bible is the inerrant word of God? that it was inspired by God written by mans hand? Without any errors?
And I’m telling you that two verses before, Exodus 3:2, it says the “Angel of the Lord” and that the usage between the “Angel” and “Lord” seems to be interchangeable.
I told you, and I shared with you how the double-usage could be explained, and how the Church Fathers (Jerome and Origen specifically) harmonized it.
I told you that I accepted their explanation, the God himself in the person of the pre-Incarnate Word (you know, the one mentioned in John 1:1) was the one who, as messenger (which is what “angel” means) and Word of the Father, appeared to Moses in the burning bush.
I don’t see why you push a disagreement when there’s none.
-Theo