[Campion]

And, by the way, there are many Catholics on this forum who reject anything written by Paul,

??? No Catholic can reject any of the canonical Pauline epistles and not be a material heretic.

I have yet to find any authorization given by God to man for man to pick and choose which Scripture is true and which is false.

You should take that up with Martin Luther.

[GiovannaNicoletta]

I've seen posts from at least one Catholic denying that the books written by Paul have any relevance as Scripture.

I don't care, you understand, that is between them and the Person Who wrote the Bible. My issue was the hypocrisy of the poster who rejected the Epistles based on the lame excuse that they were part of the Catholic church without providing any believable, valid justification for his denial of those particular Scriptures.

As for Martin Luther, the fact that he was an anti-Semite and provided inspiration for the Nazis costs him a lot of credibility with me. Martin Luther is not someone who I hold in very high esteem so any insults against him are basically meaningless as far as I'm concerned.

[smvoice]

As I pointed out to you on another thread, Campion, Peter’s LAST DAYS speak of REVIVAL. Paul’s LAST DAYS speak of APOSTACY. Since God does NOT contradict Himself, then there is obviously something DIFFERENT happening in Paul’s message than in Peter’s message. Both true. And both given by inspiration of the Holy Spirit. How can this be?