Replies

"he skips" -- well, yeah. I don't like the annulment used in this case either. he may have proved it to the canonical lawyers, but I still believe divorce is wrong and Newt was wrong to have those divorces.

I think he's got a bad moral past. On policies while in office he has been conservative. I think he'd be a good choice for candidate -- and note that before him I supported first Bachman then Cain before I only in the past couple of weeks (slightly before Cain's "scandals") started seeing Gingrich as the viable choice with Cain.

I was on this board months ago before the debates supporting Bachman despite the lib media's attempts to cause friction between Catholics and her campaign. I supported her as I thought she was the best person -- Lutheran or not, but then she turned out to be a whiner attacking everyone BUT Romney.

I supported a Baptist like Cain because I believed he was the right person -- I still like him and hope he gets a position in the cabinet if not VP.

Now I support Gingrich because he is a good choice -- he has been conservative IN government, he is anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage. he is fiscally sound and he is against Islam.

And he can kick Obambi's hind-quarters in any debate.

He may skip, but he can still kick Obmbi and bring the US out of its terminal velocity.

Make no mistake -- I dislike Romney because he's a RINO. Gingrich is not a RINO -- I support him NOT because he's Catholic, that's not entered in the equation at all.

If I could support a Baptist or a Lutheran or a Pentecostal or whatever other conservative, I would -- 4 more years of Obama ensures that the US becomes a failed state in 2020.

Even Romney isn't as bad as Obambi -- he would slow it so that we'd only fail in 2025 :)

Palin would be best for a complete reversal back to our position of strength, but in her absence I sincerely believe that Gingrich, with all his flaws, is the best choice. He will reverse the rot. He may not be able to kill it -- but we can push him to do that -- at the minimum he will reverse it.

in fact as I said on this thread about Bachmann I'm Catholic and while I don't like the language in the WELS statement, I recognize it as a historical viewpoint not their belief today. They disagree with my beliefs as I do with theirs.

Michelle, one may like or not like, but she does not hold to his belief and I would be surprised if this was a regular sermon at her WELS Church

I posted this as an example of media trying to toss anything and everything against a viable GOP candidate.

But as you can see here on this thread, some of the closet Dim supporters are out there trying to prove me wrong that they will toss out a candidate just because he's Catholic and not saved according to them (post 33).