Words such as "false" "error" "wrong" do not attribute motive.
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
Deceit is showing out from under the LDS skirt of self righteousness. The quote in post #98 is not ‘taken out of context’. The quoted passage is a clear assertion in the spirit of antichrist, recorded for posterity in the LDS inc JOurnal of Discourses. LDS apologists have chosen to try and deceive readers into thinking that quote is somehow less devilish if read in the context of the utterance. I listed the JD source date and number, why don’t LDS apologists show us how the spirit of antichrist will not be upon the utterance if ‘read in context’? If LDS inc cannot whitewash the assertion so it is not serving the spirit of antichrist then why not renounce the demonic cult into which they’ve tossed your immortal soul?
Will that work?
Words such as "false" "error" "wrong" do not attribute motive.
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
HUH?
Sandy, your deceit is showing out from under your LDS skirt. The quote in post #98 is not ‘taken out of context’. It is a clear assertion int he spirit of antichrist. You know it but have chosen totry and deceive readers into thinking that quote is somehow less devilish is read int he context of the utterance. I listed the JD source date and number, why don’t you show us how the spirit of antichrist will not be upon the utterance if ‘read in context’? You’re supposedly a lawyer, give it a try. BUT if you cannot whitewash the assertion so it is not serving the spirit of antichrist then why not renounce the demonic cult into which you’ve tossed your immortal soul?