Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: impimp
>>Regardless there is no splitting of Peter’s authority - the early church would attest to that.<<

Yeah right, that’s why Paul had to set Peter straight and it was James who made the final decision in the council of Jerusalem.

113 posted on 12/01/2011 8:47:22 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear

No Peter made the final decision in Jerusalem. The assembly fell silent after he spoke. James spoke after Peter about some specifics, just as lawyers speak after CEOs make decisions.

Why weren’t the successors of Paul or James made popes if they held authority?

When I speak of the early church I am referring to non-biblical accounts made by historians in the the first century or so after our Lord died and rose again. Check those sources. Like the Didache.


116 posted on 12/01/2011 9:15:51 PM PST by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson