Those who accept literally the story of Noah - and think all species on Earth are descended from those “kinds” of animals that could fit on a Ark - believes in evolution and the (semi) common descent of species.
Moreover they believe evolution happens at a rate far in excess of that ever proposed by any competent evolutionary biologist.
And yet they claim to not believe in evolution.
They are obviously quite confused.
Actually the big difference is that most creationists believe in micro evolution but not macro evolution. Most darwinists deny the distinction has any meaning. Hence your critique makes sense to you but not to a creationist. And the crosstalking continues.
Adaptation is Not evolution.
Adaptation gives us all the breeds of dogs, which all come from a dog.
Evolution would have us believe that a dog could come from an animal that is NOT a dog; or a man would come from a non-man.
Moreover they believe evolution happens at a rate far in excess of that ever proposed by any competent evolutionary biologist.
And yet they claim to not believe in evolution.
They are obviously quite confused.
Some people who believe in magical babies conceived without a human father call themselves evolutionists as well. They are also very confused.
Nope. Not confused in the least.
We don’t believe in “evolution” (i.e., the increase of genetic information and complexity over time).
We believe in a kind of “devolution” (i.e., the decrease and confusion of genetic information over time, a result of The Fall).
Consider the “orchard model” of creation, for example: http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-2-variation-and-natural-selection-versus-evolution