Please point where I offered ANY excuse and justification for this sort of dissent. The issue I had is the presentation of this kind of moral heresy as Catholic teaching, which it isn’t. Catholic moral teaching on homosexuality is crystal clear. The Episcopalian homosexual activist referredd to here is a PROTESTANT, and he is introducing his Protestant subjective approach to sexual morality into the Catholic Church, granted with the connivance of homosexualists dissenters within the Church. But the sinful actions of Catholics, including priests, and any lack of discipline of them, changes not one whit of the correct moral teaching on homosexuality handed down from the Apostles. Protestants, without any teaching authority founded on the successor of Peter and the apostles, will inevitably go the way of moral heresy, since inclination to sexual sin is very strong in fallen man, and without any authoritative teaching, people will find justification and excuses.
Amen.