Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mas cerveza por favor
This single commentary is probably not conclusive, but it must have been approved as part of the Douay Rheims bible.

The magisterium has the responsibility to be the teaching arm of the church..isn't it strange that in 2000 years they NEVER wrote a complete official commentary of the scriptures.. This allows every commentator to be his own personal interpreter of the bible.. exactly what catholics accuse protestants of being

1,331 posted on 11/29/2011 3:10:38 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1323 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7
isn't it strange that in 2000 years they NEVER wrote a complete official commentary of the scriptures

That is opposite to how the Church works. At the start, the Apostles verbally handed on the teachings they had received directly from Jesus and from the Paraclete, mostly through councils but perhaps sometimes individually. The Gospels, Acts, and Apocalypse formed the basis of written teaching but most everything else came as a response to problems that required fixing (or heresies that required suppression). The Church can never undefine a teaching she has infallibly defined. Therefore, the Church only defines doctrine when it is absolutely necessary.

1,345 posted on 11/29/2011 3:34:22 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson