Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Episcopal Bishop to Preach at San Francisco Catholic Parish
Catholic Culture ^ | 11/22/11

Posted on 11/23/2011 11:11:08 AM PST by marshmallow

A notoriously 'gay-friendly' parish in San Francisco has invited an openly homosexual Episcopalian cleric to lead an Advent Vespers service.

Most Holy Redeemer parish asked Bishop Otis Charles, a retired Episcopalian prelate, to lead the November 30 service. After serving as the Bishop of Utah from 1971 to 1993, he publicly announced that he is homosexual. Divorced from the mother of his 5 children, he solemnized a same-sex union in 2004.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: catholic; ecus; episcopagan; episcopaganbishop; homonaziagenda; homonazibishop; homosexualagenda; homosexualbishop; religiousfaggot; religiousleft; romancatholic; sanfranpsycho; sanfransicko; sexualpaganism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,241-3,2603,261-3,2803,281-3,300 ... 4,081-4,087 next last
To: Lera
Jer 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.

If you read the whole chapter, you should see that this is figurative language for the apostacy of the two Jewish kingdoms - Israel and Judah.

3,261 posted on 12/09/2011 5:30:47 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3244 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Interesting thought: were the hippies the result of the Reformation, or at least the result of Rapture theology?

Probably not. That movement came from the "immanentizing the eschaton" side of politics, not from the "seeking a novel way of shortening the days" side of religion.

Well, I was referring to the I me mine mentality, and the idea of undeserved reward.

3,262 posted on 12/09/2011 5:32:52 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3251 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
And keep the terminology straight: the pre-tribulation rapture eschatology.

Gotcha.

3,263 posted on 12/09/2011 5:33:35 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3255 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

So you’re saying that no Catholic argued against those books prior to Trent? Remember that I asked what books did Luther reject that other RCs prior to Trent did not.


3,264 posted on 12/09/2011 5:54:57 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3257 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Yeah, I figured that would stump you.


3,265 posted on 12/09/2011 5:59:45 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3246 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Well, I was referring to the I me mine mentality, and the idea of undeserved reward.

I think that pretty much goes back as far as Adam and Eve.
3,266 posted on 12/09/2011 6:05:23 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3262 | View Replies]

To: caww; one Lord one faith one baptism
>> “All power is given to thee in Heaven and on earth, so that at the command of Mary all obey even God . . . and thus . . . God has placed the whole Church . . . under the dominion of Mary” (pp. 180-181).<<

That would be classified blasphemy and heretical and an abomination to God just as it was in Jeremiah.

Apology indeed. When the CC specifically states that they have replaced Christ with Mary no apology is needed for speaking the truth.

3,267 posted on 12/09/2011 6:13:43 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3236 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
>>Matthew 19:14 Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these."<<

The CC says they have to go to Mary first.

3,268 posted on 12/09/2011 6:20:35 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3256 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; Lera
>>If you read the whole chapter, you should see that this is figurative language for the apostacy of the two Jewish kingdoms - Israel and Judah<<

Actually if you read the whole chapter you see that God brings Israel back and restores her. Taking a portion of what God is saying trying to make a liar out of Him won’t sit well with Him I think.

Jeremiah 3:12 Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the LORD; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the LORD, and I will not keep anger for ever. 13 Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the LORD thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the LORD. 14 Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion: 15 And I will give you pastors according to mine heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding. 16 And it shall come to pass, when ye be multiplied and increased in the land, in those days, saith the LORD, they shall say no more, The ark of the covenant of the LORD: neither shall it come to mind: neither shall they remember it; neither shall they visit it; neither shall that be done any more. 17 At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the LORD; and all the nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of the LORD, to Jerusalem: neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart. 18 In those days the house of Judah shall walk with the house of Israel, and they shall come together out of the land of the north to the land that I have given for an inheritance unto your fathers.

3,269 posted on 12/09/2011 6:33:09 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3261 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Many political scientists have drawn connections between the ideals of the Radical Reformation and the rise of the political left in the 18th and 19th centuries.

http://bit.ly/t9riUI


3,270 posted on 12/09/2011 6:43:11 AM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3251 | View Replies]

To: caww; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; count-your-change; ...
The real test would be to take Mary out of Catholicism for a while and see what happens to the religion.

Would, or even COULD Catholics go for any length of time without praying to Mary or even thinking about her?

Jeremiah 29:13 You shall seek me, and shall find me: when you shall seek me with all your heart.

I would dare any Catholic to spend a month praying only to God, not Mary, not any saints, not even telling anyone else they're doing it and asking them to pray for them, just them and the Father, asking the Holy Spirit to guide them, seeking God alone with their whole heart, and see just where the Father leads them.

Read ONLY Scripture and nothing else. I would challenge them to trust ONLY God.

3,271 posted on 12/09/2011 6:48:35 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3203 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Indeed. The Protestants should use the Septuagint’s redacted version of Jeremiah as well as its version of the Book of Job.

Another problem, the Septuagint played an important role in salvation history because it predicted the virgin birth, which the Jews later falsified.

If the Protestant Fundamentalists want to worship the Massoretic text. They can have at it because it was a text that the Jews composed AFTER the split between Judaism and Christianity aimed at stemming the flow of converts.


3,272 posted on 12/09/2011 6:48:57 AM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3260 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
Those books were not challenged by the scholastics and hadn't been since the 4th century. The 4th century Church historian Eusebius writes: Among the disputed writings, [των αντιλεγομένων], which are nevertheless recognized by many, are extant the so-called epistle of James and that of Jude, also the second epistle of Peter, and those that are called the second and third of John, whether they belong to the evangelist or to another person of the same name. Among the rejected writings must be reckoned also the Acts of Paul, and the so-called Shepherd, and the Apocalypse of Peter, and in addition to these the extant epistle of Barnabas, and the so-called Teachings of the Apostles; and besides, as I said, the Apocalypse of John, if it seem proper, which some, as I said, reject, but which others class with the accepted books. And among these some have placed also the Gospel according to the Hebrews, with which those of the Hebrews that have accepted Christ are especially delighted. And all these may be reckoned among the disputed books [των αντιλεγομένων Origen also rejected Hebrews, 2&3 John, Jude, and Revelation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antilegomena http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_New_Testament_canon
3,273 posted on 12/09/2011 6:55:01 AM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3264 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
So you’re saying that no Catholic argued against those books prior to Trent? Remember that I asked what books did Luther reject that other RCs prior to Trent did not.

Ah, ah, ah.

Terminology. Individual Catholics (never mind this RC business) may debate, but in the end, it is the Magisterium that decides. Individual bishops argued for and against the inclusion of specific books, however various Ecumenical Councils canonized Scripture and that was that.

The Didache and Hermas were often used as Scripture and the Apocalypse of John usually not, however, the Church wound up canonizing one and setting the other two aside.

There is the authority of the Church. And then there is the opinion of the individual. I might suggest that one learns the lessons of, say, Nestorius or Arius.

3,274 posted on 12/09/2011 6:57:50 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3264 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Well, I was referring to the I me mine mentality, and the idea of undeserved reward.

I think that pretty much goes back as far as Adam and Eve.

But you must admit that it got a resurgence at the Reformation and took off full blown at the Restoration.

3,275 posted on 12/09/2011 6:58:58 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3266 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
>>Matthew 19:14 Jesus said, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these."<<

The CC says they have to go to Mary first.

Negative. Anyone who says that goes against Church teaching. Now, we believe that all Mariology points at Christ. Mariolatry is met with excommunication.

Period.

3,276 posted on 12/09/2011 7:00:42 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3268 | View Replies]

To: metmom
>>Read ONLY Scripture and nothing else. I would challenge them to trust ONLY God.<<

I’m thinking you will get no takers on that.

3,277 posted on 12/09/2011 7:00:58 AM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3271 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
>If you read the whole chapter, you should see that this is figurative language for the apostacy of the two Jewish kingdoms - Israel and Judah<<

Actually if you read the whole chapter you see that God brings Israel back and restores her. Taking a portion of what God is saying trying to make a liar out of Him won’t sit well with Him I think.

Your translation of verse 14 says marriage ie spouse. The correct translation is master. Faulty translations make for faulty theology, do they not?

3,278 posted on 12/09/2011 7:02:44 AM PST by MarkBsnr (I would not believe in the Gospel, if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3269 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Quoting from the falsified Jewish text. The Septuagint reads more clearly than the anti-Christian Massoretic text:

11 And the Lord said to me, Israel has justified himself more than faithless Juda.
12 Go and read these words toward the north, and thou shalt say, Return to me, O house of Israel, saith the Lord; and I will not set my face against you: for I am merciful, saith the Lord, and I will not be angry with you for ever. 13 Nevertheless, know thine iniquity, that thou hast sinned against the Lord thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to strangers under every shady tree, but thou didst not hearken to my voice, saith the Lord. 14 Turn, ye children that have revolted, saith the Lord; for I will rule over you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you in to Sion: 15 and I will give you shepherds after my heart, and they shall certainly tend you with knowledge.

18 In those days the house of Juda, shall come together to the house of Israel, and they shall come, together, from the land of the north, and from all the countries, to the land, which I caused their fathers to inherit. 19 And I said, So be it, Lord, for thou saidst I will set thee among children, and will give thee a choice land, the inheritance of the Almighty God of the Gentiles: and I said, Ye shall call me Father; and ye shall not turn away from me. 20 But as a wife acts treacherously against her husband, so has the house of Israel dealt treacherously against me, saith the Lord.


3,279 posted on 12/09/2011 7:09:32 AM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3269 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

The Dead Sea Scrolls have vindicated the Septuagint recension of the Book of Jeremiah compared with the Protestant/Rabinnical Massoretic texts.


3,280 posted on 12/09/2011 7:11:46 AM PST by rzman21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3279 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,241-3,2603,261-3,2803,281-3,300 ... 4,081-4,087 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson