Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The king of the bibles
The Telegraph ^ | November 14, 2011 | Peter Mullen

Posted on 11/18/2011 9:49:29 PM PST by hiho hiho

For centuries, people of all walks of life have carried around with them echoes of the King James Version. So to throw it out as the church hierarchy has done amounts to a savage act of deprivation and, as this deprivation is of the Word of God in English, it is vicious iconoclasm. Sidelining the King James Version especially deprives our children and is therefore a notable case of child abuse.

There is no such thing as noble truth expressed in ignoble words. The choice of words determines what is being said. Therefore, we should choose the best.

“Strips of cloth” is no substitute for “swaddling clothes”. And Mary was “with child” – we think of the Madonna and Child – and she had not “fallen pregnant” as it says in one of the modern versions. You cannot satisfactorily replace “through a glass darkly” with the crass literalism “puzzling reflections in a mirror” or “sounding brass and tinkling cymbal” with “noisy gong and clanging cymbal”. The King James Bible was designed to be read aloud in churches. All the modern versions sound as if they have been written by tone-deaf people with tin ears and no rhythm.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion; History; Worship
KEYWORDS: bible; bibles; bibletranslation; bibletranslations; britain; britishempire; christianity; kingjames; kingjamesversion; kjv; kjvbible; kjvbibletranslation; kjvtranslation; kjvversion; mullen; petermullen; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: hiho hiho
The KJV is suppressed?

Who would know? It's not the complete Bible!!!!!!

Bible


"We are compelled to concede to the Papists
that they have the Word of God,
that we received it from them,
and that without them
we should have no knowledge of it at all."

~ Martin Luther



St. Jerome and the Vulgate (completing the FIRST Bible in the year 404) [Catholic Caucus]
In Bible Times
Deuterocanonical References in the New Testament

Translations Before the King James: - The KJV Translators Speak!
EWTN Live - March 23 - A Journey Through the Bible
"Our Father's Plan" - EWTN series with Dr. Scott Hahn and Jeff Cavins on the Bible timeline
The Daunting Journey From Faith to Faith [Anglicanism to Catholicism]
Reflections on the Soon to Be Released New American Bible (Revised Edition)[Catholic Caucus]
New American Bible changes some words such as "holocaust"
Is the Bible the Only Revelation from God? (Catholic / Orthodox Caucus)
History of the Bible (caution: long)
Catholic and Protestant Bibles
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: ON READING THE BIBLE [Catholic Caucus]

Because I Love the Bible
Where Is That Taught in the Bible?
When Was the Bible Really Written?
Three Reasons for Teaching the Bible [St. Thomas Aquinas]
The Smiting Is Still Implied (God of the OT vs the NT)
Where Is That Taught in the Bible?
Friday Fast Fact: The Bible in English
Bible Reading is Central in Conversions to Catholicism in Shangai, Reports Organization
Verses (in Scripture) I Never Saw
5 Myths about 7 Books

Lectionary Statistics - How much of the Bible is included in the Lectionary for Mass? (Popquiz!)
Pope calls Catholics to daily meditation on the Bible
What Are the "Apocrypha?"
The Accuracy of Scripture
US Conference of Catholic Bishops recommendations for Bible study
CNA unveils resource to help Catholics understand the Scriptures
The Dos and Don’ts of Reading the Bible [Ecumenical]
Pope to lead marathon Bible reading on Italian TV
The Complete Bible: Why Catholics Have Seven More Books [Ecumenical]
Beginning Catholic: Books of the Catholic Bible: The Complete Scriptures [Ecumenical]

Beginning Catholic: When Was The Bible Written? [Ecumenical]
The Complete Bible: Why Catholics Have Seven More Books [Ecumenical]
U.S. among most Bible-literate nations: poll
Bible Lovers Not Defined by Denomination, Politics
Dei Verbum (Catholics and the Bible)
Vatican Offers Rich Online Source of Bible Commentary
Clergy Congregation Takes Bible Online
Knowing Mary Through the Bible: Mary's Last Words
A Bible Teaser For You... (for everyone :-)
Knowing Mary Through the Bible: New Wine, New Eve

Return of Devil's Bible to Prague draws crowds
Doctrinal Concordance of the Bible [What Catholics Believe from the Bible] Catholic Caucus
Should We Take the Bible Literally or Figuratively?
Glimpsing Words, Practices, or Beliefs Unique to Catholicism [Bible Trivia]
Catholic and Protestant Bibles: What is the Difference?
Church and the Bible(Caatholic Caucus)
Pope Urges Prayerful Reading of Bible
Catholic Caucus: It's the Church's Bible
How Tradition Gave Us the Bible
The Church or the Bible

41 posted on 11/19/2011 9:56:22 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
You don't suppose that the editors of one of Great Britain's great newspapers are familiar with the provenance of the King James translation?
42 posted on 11/19/2011 10:04:15 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Evidently they have never heard that the ORIGINAL Bible was translated in Latin and all the English translation should adhere to the Latin.

Boy, would that be a change! LOL!


43 posted on 11/19/2011 10:25:06 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire

**If the King James Version was good enough for the Apostle Paul**

Huh?

Paul read in Latin and Greek — not English!


44 posted on 11/19/2011 10:26:02 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Actually the ‘original’ Bible, the Torah, was translated into Greek. Later, when the New Testament was combined with the Torah by Christians, the texts were translated into Latin. That did mkae for a few interesting ‘transpositions’ too.


45 posted on 11/19/2011 10:29:20 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hiho hiho

The King James Bible is the only Bible I use. Its the only one I trust.


46 posted on 11/19/2011 10:44:10 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Lets keep in mind the Catholic church resisted attempts to put the Bible in the common man’s hands.


47 posted on 11/19/2011 10:47:15 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

They never resisited that. Bibles in the ancient days were copied (tediously) by hand and were very rare.

What was the first Bible printed by the Guttenberg printing press?

Do you know the answer? Or do you not care?


48 posted on 11/19/2011 10:59:35 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
Surprise! The first Bible printed by Gutenberg was the CATHOLIC Bible! LOL!

Relationship to earlier Bibles


In appearance the Gutenberg Bible closely resembles the large manuscript
Illuminated manuscript
An illuminated manuscript is a manuscript in which the text is supplemented by the addition of decoration, such as decorated initials, borders and miniature illustrations...

 Bibles that were being produced at the time. The Giant Bible of Mainz
Giant Bible of Mainz
The Giant Bible of Mainz is a very large manuscript Bible produced in 1452-3, probably in Mainz or nearby. It is notable for its beauty, for being one of the last manuscript Bibles written before the invention of printing in the West, and for its possible connections with the Gutenberg...

, probably produced in Mainz in 1452-3, has been suggested as the particular model Gutenberg used. Around this time large Bibles, designed to be read from a lectern, were returning to popularity for the first time since the twelfth century. In the intervening period, small hand-held Bibles had been usual. The text of the Gutenberg Bible is traditional, falling within the Paris Vulgate group of texts. Manuscript Bibles all had texts that differed slightly, and the copy used by Gutenberg as the exemplar for his Bible has not been discovered.
 

Influence on later Bibles


The Gutenberg Bible had an incalculable effect on the history of the printed book. Textually, it also had an influence on future editions of the Bible. It provided the model for the 36 Line Bible, while a Strasbourg edition of the Bible from 1470 is known to have been set from the copy now in Cambridge University Library. The Gutenberg Bible also had an influence on the Clementine
Pope Clement VIII
Pope Clement VIII , born Ippolito Aldobrandini, was Pope from 30 January 1592 to 3 March 1605.-Cardinal:...

 edition of the Vulgate commissioned by the Papacy in the late sixteenth century.

49 posted on 11/19/2011 11:16:20 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

But it is incomplete — how can you trust it?


50 posted on 11/19/2011 11:18:24 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Thanks for the correction — I knew I should not have said original, but rather have said “Latin” translation.


51 posted on 11/19/2011 11:19:28 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire

I was given, as a gift, a quad Bible that has KJV, NIV, ASB, and Amplified. It has been quite helpful in my studies.

I have to agree about the beauty of the king’s 16th Century English. Ever heard anything sweeter than the KJV 23rd Psalm?
Didn’t think so.


52 posted on 11/19/2011 11:25:33 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Let's roll on this gunwalking thing already! NRA <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"What was the first Bible printed by the Guttenberg printing press?"

Given that at the time it was a capital offense to possess or distribute any other translation than the Latin Vulgate - punishable by burning at the stake - my guess is the first bible printed by the Gutenberg press was the Latin Vulgate.

53 posted on 11/19/2011 11:26:02 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: one Lord one faith one baptism
the chapters and verses were set 300 years before the KJV Bible was translated by an English Catholic Archbishop, Stephen Langton.

Thank you

54 posted on 11/19/2011 11:28:09 AM PST by tommix2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

You get the prize for the correct answer!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2809733/posts?page=49#49


55 posted on 11/19/2011 11:34:50 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Torahman
'TrinitarianBibleSociety’ is an oxymoron. there is no Trinity in the Bible.

Ah, have you read Isaiah 48:16,17 in your inspired, inerrant, verbal, plenary, preserved Scriptures?

"Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I; and now the Lord GOD, and His Spirit, hath sent me.

Thus saith the LORD, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am the LORD thy God which teaches thee to profit, which leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go." (from the AV, though not inspired, yet a faithful translation into English from the Masoretic text)

In Torah, at the very Beginning (Genesis - Bereshith) the Three Persons, as declaimed to Isaiah, are thus present in their self-assigned capacities of creation, organization, and supervision.

Furthermore, are you not similarly a triunity of flesh, heart, and spirit, made after the image of the Uniplural Elohim, as described in His Written Word by Moshiah from the very First chapter?

Are not each of the created elements manifested in solid, liquid, and gaseous phases of the same substance, capable of being together concurrently and transitioning back and forth between each of the phases without losing character?

Hunh? Eh?

56 posted on 11/19/2011 11:44:38 AM PST by imardmd1 ((Let the Redeemed of The LORD say so ...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

**there is no Trinity in the Bible.**

Oh, but there is.

Read the last chapter of Matthew, “Go ye therefore, to all the nations, baptizing the in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”

And then re-read 1 Peter, for he also references Father, Son and Holy Spirit.


57 posted on 11/19/2011 11:53:05 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
For your information from 1 Peter Chapter 1

 

1 Peter, Chapter 1

 
3* Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who in his great mercy gave us a new birth to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,c
 
12
It was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but you with regard to the things that have now been announced to you by those who preached the good news to you [through] the holy Spirit sent from heaven, things into which angels longed to look.

58 posted on 11/19/2011 12:01:27 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Over 85% of the KJV is taken verbatim from John Tyndale’s translation.

William, I believe? Tyndale was not able to finish the translation of the Old Testament inasmuch as he lost the ability to breathe.

59 posted on 11/19/2011 12:12:06 PM PST by imardmd1 ((Let the Redeemed of The LORD say so ...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
"William, I believe?"

Yes, of course William. What an embarrassing brain fade that was.

60 posted on 11/19/2011 12:18:55 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson