Posted on 11/18/2011 9:49:29 PM PST by hiho hiho
For centuries, people of all walks of life have carried around with them echoes of the King James Version. So to throw it out as the church hierarchy has done amounts to a savage act of deprivation and, as this deprivation is of the Word of God in English, it is vicious iconoclasm. Sidelining the King James Version especially deprives our children and is therefore a notable case of child abuse.
There is no such thing as noble truth expressed in ignoble words. The choice of words determines what is being said. Therefore, we should choose the best.
Strips of cloth is no substitute for swaddling clothes. And Mary was with child we think of the Madonna and Child and she had not fallen pregnant as it says in one of the modern versions. You cannot satisfactorily replace through a glass darkly with the crass literalism puzzling reflections in a mirror or sounding brass and tinkling cymbal with noisy gong and clanging cymbal. The King James Bible was designed to be read aloud in churches. All the modern versions sound as if they have been written by tone-deaf people with tin ears and no rhythm.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Who would know? It's not the complete Bible!!!!!!
Translations Before the King James: - The KJV Translators Speak!
EWTN Live - March 23 - A Journey Through the Bible
"Our Father's Plan" - EWTN series with Dr. Scott Hahn and Jeff Cavins on the Bible timeline
The Daunting Journey From Faith to Faith [Anglicanism to Catholicism]
Reflections on the Soon to Be Released New American Bible (Revised Edition)[Catholic Caucus]
New American Bible changes some words such as "holocaust"
Is the Bible the Only Revelation from God? (Catholic / Orthodox Caucus)
History of the Bible (caution: long)
Catholic and Protestant Bibles
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: ON READING THE BIBLE [Catholic Caucus]
Because I Love the Bible
Where Is That Taught in the Bible?
When Was the Bible Really Written?
Three Reasons for Teaching the Bible [St. Thomas Aquinas]
The Smiting Is Still Implied (God of the OT vs the NT)
Where Is That Taught in the Bible?
Friday Fast Fact: The Bible in English
Bible Reading is Central in Conversions to Catholicism in Shangai, Reports Organization
Verses (in Scripture) I Never Saw
5 Myths about 7 Books
Lectionary Statistics - How much of the Bible is included in the Lectionary for Mass? (Popquiz!)
Pope calls Catholics to daily meditation on the Bible
What Are the "Apocrypha?"
The Accuracy of Scripture
US Conference of Catholic Bishops recommendations for Bible study
CNA unveils resource to help Catholics understand the Scriptures
The Dos and Donts of Reading the Bible [Ecumenical]
Pope to lead marathon Bible reading on Italian TV
The Complete Bible: Why Catholics Have Seven More Books [Ecumenical]
Beginning Catholic: Books of the Catholic Bible: The Complete Scriptures [Ecumenical]
Beginning Catholic: When Was The Bible Written? [Ecumenical]
The Complete Bible: Why Catholics Have Seven More Books [Ecumenical]
U.S. among most Bible-literate nations: poll
Bible Lovers Not Defined by Denomination, Politics
Dei Verbum (Catholics and the Bible)
Vatican Offers Rich Online Source of Bible Commentary
Clergy Congregation Takes Bible Online
Knowing Mary Through the Bible: Mary's Last Words
A Bible Teaser For You... (for everyone :-)
Knowing Mary Through the Bible: New Wine, New Eve
Return of Devil's Bible to Prague draws crowds
Doctrinal Concordance of the Bible [What Catholics Believe from the Bible] Catholic Caucus
Should We Take the Bible Literally or Figuratively?
Glimpsing Words, Practices, or Beliefs Unique to Catholicism [Bible Trivia]
Catholic and Protestant Bibles: What is the Difference?
Church and the Bible(Caatholic Caucus)
Pope Urges Prayerful Reading of Bible
Catholic Caucus: It's the Church's Bible
How Tradition Gave Us the Bible
The Church or the Bible
Evidently they have never heard that the ORIGINAL Bible was translated in Latin and all the English translation should adhere to the Latin.
Boy, would that be a change! LOL!
**If the King James Version was good enough for the Apostle Paul**
Huh?
Paul read in Latin and Greek — not English!
Actually the ‘original’ Bible, the Torah, was translated into Greek. Later, when the New Testament was combined with the Torah by Christians, the texts were translated into Latin. That did mkae for a few interesting ‘transpositions’ too.
The King James Bible is the only Bible I use. Its the only one I trust.
Lets keep in mind the Catholic church resisted attempts to put the Bible in the common man’s hands.
They never resisited that. Bibles in the ancient days were copied (tediously) by hand and were very rare.
What was the first Bible printed by the Guttenberg printing press?
Do you know the answer? Or do you not care?
Relationship to earlier Bibles
, probably produced in Mainz in 1452-3, has been suggested as the particular model Gutenberg used. Around this time large Bibles, designed to be read from a lectern, were returning to popularity for the first time since the twelfth century. In the intervening period, small hand-held Bibles had been usual. The text of the Gutenberg Bible is traditional, falling within the Paris Vulgate group of texts. Manuscript Bibles all had texts that differed slightly, and the copy used by Gutenberg as the exemplar for his Bible has not been discovered.Influence on later Bibles
The Gutenberg Bible had an incalculable effect on the history of the printed book. Textually, it also had an influence on future editions of the Bible. It provided the model for the 36 Line Bible, while a Strasbourg edition of the Bible from 1470 is known to have been set from the copy now in Cambridge University Library. The Gutenberg Bible also had an influence on the Clementine
edition of the Vulgate commissioned by the Papacy in the late sixteenth century.
But it is incomplete — how can you trust it?
Thanks for the correction — I knew I should not have said original, but rather have said “Latin” translation.
I was given, as a gift, a quad Bible that has KJV, NIV, ASB, and Amplified. It has been quite helpful in my studies.
I have to agree about the beauty of the king’s 16th Century English. Ever heard anything sweeter than the KJV 23rd Psalm?
Didn’t think so.
Given that at the time it was a capital offense to possess or distribute any other translation than the Latin Vulgate - punishable by burning at the stake - my guess is the first bible printed by the Gutenberg press was the Latin Vulgate.
Thank you
You get the prize for the correct answer!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2809733/posts?page=49#49
Ah, have you read Isaiah 48:16,17 in your inspired, inerrant, verbal, plenary, preserved Scriptures?
"Come ye near unto me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I; and now the Lord GOD, and His Spirit, hath sent me.
Thus saith the LORD, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am the LORD thy God which teaches thee to profit, which leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go." (from the AV, though not inspired, yet a faithful translation into English from the Masoretic text)
In Torah, at the very Beginning (Genesis - Bereshith) the Three Persons, as declaimed to Isaiah, are thus present in their self-assigned capacities of creation, organization, and supervision.
Furthermore, are you not similarly a triunity of flesh, heart, and spirit, made after the image of the Uniplural Elohim, as described in His Written Word by Moshiah from the very First chapter?
Are not each of the created elements manifested in solid, liquid, and gaseous phases of the same substance, capable of being together concurrently and transitioning back and forth between each of the phases without losing character?
Hunh? Eh?
**there is no Trinity in the Bible.**
Oh, but there is.
Read the last chapter of Matthew, “Go ye therefore, to all the nations, baptizing the in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”
And then re-read 1 Peter, for he also references Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
William, I believe? Tyndale was not able to finish the translation of the Old Testament inasmuch as he lost the ability to breathe.
Yes, of course William. What an embarrassing brain fade that was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.