Does this mean that the entire Penn State school be responsible for the homosexual attacks by a coach on less than twenty young boys?
That's a much easier call. Penn State would most likely be liable under the doctrine respondiat superior.
To the extent that the Superiors knew what was going on, yes. Just like Rome.
At Penn State any supervisor who knew the pervert was banging little boys and who made decisions to keep him in that position with access to boys, should be examined for criminal charges, up for civil law suit damages by the victims and fired by the University.
Penn State employed and hosted the child sex operation players so the organization is responsible to pay the victims damages. Institutions and businesses need to know that the cost is very high for sexually abusing children and young people in their charge -boys, included.
This is the only way porking young people will become taboo for modern elitists whose only value is materialism and immediate self gratification. The cost of covering up and hosting child abuse has to be bigger than the cost of child abuse. These sex abuse elitists put themselves and their own comfort above the value of a child’s suffering. Some of them see nothing wrong with sexually abusing boys. They see a boy as a safe sexual object. Some on FR see nothing wrong with it, too. They cheer on the rape of boys and men.