I think it cheapens the argument to have to inject bestiality or pedophilia or whatever the hell Latex-lovin' is called. If the problem is two adult men in love, then stick to that. Once you say it's against God's Word, it almost seems as if God's Word isn't enough all by Itself when you feel the need to invent slippery slope non-sequiturs.
And why is it that at every homosexual pride festival you see all of these things that you claim should not be injected? Sexuality is not a series of isolated varieties. Once sexuality is corrupted in one way it opens the door to all sorts of corruption.
Ouch, then FR's standard is pretty low! I don't know much, you ought to meet this friend of mine who was valedictorian at Dartmouth, he's a PhD AND an MD. Now that's a brainiac! I just plod along -- and if I was really smart I wish I could translate that in my career :(
you are correct. I brought that up because I assumed (and Eggs, please correct me if I am wrong) that Eggs had already heard the bit that homosexuality is against God's Word and that was not sufficient.
the argument with the "other injections" is to those who would say "God's word -- who cares?"