No exaggeration. Both are statists. Both are AGWists. Both are Amnestyites. Both crave socialized medicine.Both are effectively socialists. Obama would face opposition from a Republican Congress and probably wouldn’t even get his USSC nominees passed. Romney will push the same sorts of measures as Obama would and, as a nominal Republican, will get sufficient cooperation by the non T-Party Republicans in congress to GET his bills passed and leftist pro choice (non-partisan will be the description)Court nominees passed. Romney has also expressed a willingness to “work with the Democrats.” He said it when it could only hurt him with the Republican voters in the primaries thus he was signalling the Official Democrats where his heart really lies. Romney’s Republican congress will flip in two years so that he has basically only Democrats to “work with” and Romney will be replaced in 4 years by a more competent and more determined Marxist than the kenyan. Obama will lose the Senate in two years and find a new bottom for the Democrats before the 2016 election at which the conservatives get another chance. In the matchup Romney would NOT be the lesser of two evils and the two evils will not be equal.
So now if I’m reading you correctly, you are one who might willingly vote for Mr Obama in 2012, because Mr Romney is exactly the same and the incumbent, in this case, should definitely be the winner?
...and obviously my previous is conjecture, because we don’t have a clue who the nominee is going to be, and it is too soon for me anyway to have a preference. I don’t think any of them other than Newt, or Santorum are appealing, and to voice what many here feel, they are the unelectable. I don’t necessarily believe that, but again it is early yet.