Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus

So now if I’m reading you correctly, you are one who might willingly vote for Mr Obama in 2012, because Mr Romney is exactly the same and the incumbent, in this case, should definitely be the winner?


26 posted on 10/13/2011 5:53:06 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: wita
I wouldn't vote for the kenyan or for Romney in any circumstance. If either of them is president after 2012 we're cooked.
Mr. Romney would not have the same effect as would the kenyan. Romney would get his Democrat legislation through the Republican congress. The kenyan wouldn't succeed.
Romney would cause the congress to flip to Democrat in 2014. The kenyan would draw a more Republican and more conservative House and Senate in 2014.
A Romney presidency would ensure that an even harder core Marxist Democrat wins in 2016 as a reaction to the failure of the "Republican" presidency. The kenyan for 4 more years would give conservatives one more chance in 2016 though there might not be anything left of the economy or the society to resurrect.
Both men will appoint socialists and statists to the Cabinet and bureaucracy and to the Court, the Kenyan because he is a believing Marxist and Romney because he will be "working with the Democrats" and "reaching out."
I do expect the kenyan to do more damage with EOs than Romney would but perhaps the Republican Congress would finally stand up and counter those EOs.

I will vote for any conservative who turns out to be the Republican nominee. I would even vote for Gingrich. I won't vote for Romney or for any other Democrat, whatever he calls himself.

37 posted on 10/13/2011 1:25:40 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson