Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
That would be refreshing.

No, I don't (and haven't) said transfusion is never necessary.

My turn for a question: Can open heart surgery be performed without blood transfusion? and as a corollary,
Has the use of blood transfusion in many cases INCREASED morbidity and mortality post operatively?

59 posted on 09/20/2011 1:58:32 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change
To your first question: I don't know

To your second question: it depends

to the point of this article, I can say for a fact that in the case of accidents etc where a person has lost a lot of blood it is NECESSARY to have a blood transfusion or the person will die. Your Jehovah's Witness point of banning blood transfusions completely is wrong on this count

60 posted on 09/20/2011 2:18:27 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: count-your-change

Ah, so you do think blood transfusion is necessary at times — good. Then you would disagree with the Jehovah’s witness philosophy on this, correct?


61 posted on 09/20/2011 2:18:42 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson