[Cronos]

In fact you started this conversation like a fish-monger by comparing blood transfusion to abortion!

In post 14 you said As with abortion due to medical necessity transfusion of blood for medical necessity is a term proving obsolete.

Then, in post 35, Dr. Brian Kopp refuted your statement by pointing out that Yes, there most definitely are times when blood transfusions are not only medically necessary but ethically mandatory, i.e., without them you would be condemning a patient to death

So, do you retract your statement that abortion is the same as blood transfusion?

[count-your-change]

Oh dear! This is almost too much fun to stop now since you said:

“So, do you retract your statement that abortion is the same as blood transfusion?”

That’s your statement not mine so I have nothing to retract, do I? Of course not.

Would you like to retract it?

Thanks to Dr. Kopp for his opinion. I’m sure he’s a very good podiatrist. Should I have any questions on podiatry I will seek him out.

[Brian Kopp DPM]

Pearls before swine.

No one arguing to prevent medically and ethically necessary blood transfusions (besides their voluminous anti-Catholic ranting) is worthy of further public debate on this forum.