Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lefebvrians say they will never accept Vatican Council [Catholic Caucus]
Vatican Insider ^ | September 6, 2011

Posted on 09/09/2011 4:27:39 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: steve86

“If the great saints had been around post-1960 they might have become more discriminating as to what they obeyed and what they questioned as being the work of the devil. “

Obedience to the Church Christ founded NEVER goes out of style....no matter who is leading. Many things often happen which seem unfair. God always tests the obedience of His followers.

PS There have been great saints even after 1960.


41 posted on 09/11/2011 4:45:33 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

They don’t actually. That is why they are going to Rome, again, at his summons.


42 posted on 09/11/2011 8:39:03 AM PDT by narses ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: narses

If the Lefebrerists refuse to recognize the ecumenical authority of Vatican II, and having been brought before the Church for repentance and having refused, let them be to us as a publican. Heck, publicans will preceed them in the Kingdom of Heaven.

We did what we could. If in their obstinacy they choose to resist grace, so be it.

-Theo


43 posted on 09/11/2011 9:54:51 AM PDT by Teófilo (Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org - A Catholic Blog of News, Commentary and Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo

Are you babbling ext Cathedra or is that just your odd opinion?


44 posted on 09/11/2011 10:08:23 AM PDT by narses ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo

Are you babbling ex Cathedra or is that just your odd opinion?


45 posted on 09/11/2011 10:08:35 AM PDT by narses ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo

Why stop with the “Lefebrerists”. There aren’t more than a very few parishes in my diocese which follow the actual teachings of Vatican II. I see the same thing going on in other dioceses.
So does darn near the whole Church get ranked below the “publicans” or is some authority rejection better than others?


46 posted on 09/11/2011 10:22:28 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Teófilo

Why stop with the “Lefebrerists”. There aren’t more than a very few parishes in my diocese which follow the actual teachings of Vatican II. I see the same thing going on in other dioceses.
So does darn near the whole Church get ranked below the “publicans” or is some authority rejection better than others?


47 posted on 09/11/2011 10:22:39 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: narses

I never babble. I pontificate.

-Theo


48 posted on 09/11/2011 9:14:47 PM PDT by Teófilo (Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org - A Catholic Blog of News, Commentary and Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rogator

The wheat and the tares will grow together until the end of time.

Besides, although all the tares think they know better than the Successor of Peter, one way or the other. Some simply ignore him, whil others presume to dictate terms to him.

At times it is difficult to me to determine which one is more vile.

-Theo


49 posted on 09/11/2011 9:17:43 PM PDT by Teófilo (Visit Vivificat! - http://www.vivificat.org - A Catholic Blog of News, Commentary and Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: armydoc; Dajjal; narses

Yep, next step Dajjal is to accept abortion, gay marriage, etc. — something that won’t happen to the Church


50 posted on 09/13/2011 3:12:20 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: armydoc; Religion Moderator; narses
For that matter, armydoc, this thread is clearly marked as [Catholic Caucus], -- as a non-member of this caucus, please do not break forum rules

RM -- please note

51 posted on 09/13/2011 3:13:40 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: armydoc

This Religion Forum thread is labeled “Catholic Caucus” meaning if you are not currently, actively Catholic then do not post on this thread.


52 posted on 09/13/2011 7:21:52 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Could you confirm that this thread was originally marked “caucus”? I always respect the caucus designations and don’t recall seeing it when I first posted. Thanks.


53 posted on 09/13/2011 11:34:33 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: armydoc

There are no indications that the moderators added the “caucus” designation after it was posted and since only the mods can edit the title, it must have been posted that way.


54 posted on 09/13/2011 11:38:16 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Got it, thanks


55 posted on 09/13/2011 11:39:35 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson