Here's a better question Cronos, since when is it acceptable for you to stalk someone across several threads, which is a direct violation of the Religion Forum rules?
Especially when part of your charge is a blatant falsehood, where you're trying to smear another poster's beliefs by twisting what he's said and explained on numerous occasions. Quix holds to the doctrine of the Trinity (but you know that), holds the idea that "extra-terrestrial aliens" are actually not aliens at all but demons masquerading as aliens (but again, you know that but you want to twist it for some reason to question his sanity and, indirectly, his Salvation) and holds to the "radical" idea that we're currently seeing the formation of the Anti-Christ's government as written about in Scripture. He refers to it as the New World Order, but the idea is the same. But again, you know all this but still persist in twisting his words for your own gain.
All of that has been gleaned by actually reading what Quix has written, not what you or others have written about him. Say, wasn't there a command by a fairly famous Rabbi about not bearing false witness? Can't put my finger on it, but I'm pretty sure He did say something about that, well He did before the Romans crucified Him. Maybe you could look Him up sometime, He's even had a book or two written about His life and times. Check in your library for "Holy Bible", I'm pretty sure that a Catholic Church library would have one of those.
Anyway, I'll readily agree that some of the preachers in Quix's denomination have gotten into territory which is false teaching at the least, but do you really want to be branded by what some of the Catholic Priests have done in the past? I'll agree that Benny Hinn and Jesse DuPlantis are wrong to teach what they've been teaching, but the Inquisition was a decidedly Roman Catholic institution if you'll remember and the last I recalled, killing someone is a far graver sin, even by RCC standards, than what these false teachers are accused of.
Oh, and while I'm at it, what about calling out your own co-religionist MarkBsnr for his anti-Trinitarian statements, such as the one in post 136 where he states the following.
I have read the Koran and have a copy. Here's an even bigger hint: the Jewish OT God is not a Trinity either. He is monotheistic in the exact sense, as is Allah. Islam treats Jesus as holy. Judaism does not.
Seems to me before you talk to someone who's not a part of your own denomination you should clean your own house first.
What did that rabbi say about calling those who honor His mother a Mary-Ishtar Goddess worshipping cult? Time and time again? Not just once, but repeatedly. When it is clearly not true. I guess you believe it, though, I've never seen you ask the stalker to stop. When did you ever reprove him for posting to me? Never, that's when.
Also kind of ironic and hypocritical. It goes both ways, even if they can't see it now.
For that matter, there are some alarming statistics of what Catholic priests currently believe. Daniel1212 has them I believe.
Who is stalking? I’m pointing out the fallacies in the poster’s statements.
As the RM pointed out, it is called ridiculing a person who is so open to ridicule it is apparent.
If a poster, such as yourself, asks or even argues in a manner that makes it apparent that you sincerely want to talk, I respond in kind. But if a poster responds with his alien believe and other stuff, I like to point out the utter fallacies in his point of view.
If you don't like this, then I suggest you talk to your friend to change his tune.