You wrote:
“What you posted did not do what you claimed it would that beliefs/faith/doctrines imposed by a college in no way guarantees observance.”
That’s exactly what I showed. Those colleges had standards. They were not observed.
“In both links you gave the professors in question were not permitted to continue to teach or their book was banned. Your claim was first to slam Moody, then when someone stuck up for them, you switched to your backup of denigrating ALL Protestant Universities.”
False. Stating where the professor is from is not slamming Moody’s. No one needed to stick up for them in the first place. The prof was the one with the problem.
“Are you pretending that there are never such occurrences within the Catholic university systems?”
Nope. The difference is that no Protestant authority can make a sensible case for standards in orthodoxy in light of the fact that Protestants are not orthodox.
“ARE there an Catholic universities anymore that adhere to the Church’s teachings?”
Yep.
“It is the height of idealist based denial INDEED.”
I have exhibited none.
“I suppose your nasty repartee makes you imagine others will fear to disagree with you, but, you would be quite wrong.”
I really don’t care if anyone disagrees with me. My repartee is no more nasty and is far less nasty than the continual distortions anti-Catholics post here.
“All bark, no bite. All bluff and bluster. All the time. No love of Christ in evidence.”
I have never seen you evidence any love for Christ.
So, you deny that your first posting about this named Moody as where this imaginary "professor" came from? Remember, blue-duncan commented that he stood by Moody's and stated that they would not have permitted such a professor to teach like that?
I have never seen you evidence any love for Christ.
I guess if "love for Christ" can only possibly be held by Catholics, then you never WILL see it. However, it is Jesus who knows my heart and he's the one who really matters.