Sorry, Vlad, B-D is right on this point, whether you accept it or not. You have made an accusation by which you tar all who are "Protestants" with only a vague memory? I can only imagine the outrage had any one of us done the same about a Catholic professor!
You went from smearing Moody Bible to implicating all professors of theology who aren't Catholic. Here's the thing, WE DON'T HAVE TO PROVE your libelous statement and because you don't prove your claim and only toss out a few deflectors about one professor's book that went against the Westminster Theological Seminary and another's being fired for "heresy" for his teachings about the working of man's will, ALSO not from Moody, then you have been clearly caught in a false statement. That you will not retract it, but only use it to further flame bait, proves YOUR character for all here to see. Enjoy it!
You wrote:
“Sorry, Vlad, B-D is right on this point, whether you accept it or not. You have made an accusation by which you tar all who are “Protestants” with only a vague memory?”
Nope. Not all Protestants are tainted by what the Protestant in question did nor by what I posted. What is damning to Protestants or Protestantism is Protestantism’s own practices and beliefs.
“I can only imagine the outrage had any one of us done the same about a Catholic professor!”
Not really. I along with many other FR Catholics have noted that there are people out there who call themselves Catholics who have said or done unorthodox things. The difference is that they do things at variance with the basic principles of Catholicism. This guy was simply acting on the obvious outcome of a sola scriptura belief.
“You went from smearing Moody Bible to implicating all professors of theology who aren’t Catholic.”
False. I mentioned that the professor in question was from there. How is that a smear against Moody BI?
“Here’s the thing, WE DON’T HAVE TO PROVE your libelous statement and because you don’t prove your claim and only toss out a few deflectors about one professor’s book that went against the Westminster Theological Seminary and another’s being fired for “heresy” for his teachings about the working of man’s will, ALSO not from Moody, then you have been clearly caught in a false statement.”
Your statement is logically false. Not being able to post evidence of a thing is not proof that the thing is false.
“That you will not retract it, but only use it to further flame bait, proves YOUR character for all here to see. Enjoy it!”
I have no reason to retract it. I have been upfront from the beginning that I cannot find and do not have the article. The fact that you are labeling me a liar when you have not a single shred of evidence I have EVER lied only tells us about your character. The fact that I cannot post proof of what I am said - which I admitted - is only proof I have no evidence. It is not proof or error or lying. Everything you do is proof of your apparent desperation.