Just Google the following direct quote from your post and you get at least 5 hits. It ain't rocket science so when you are caught with your hand in the cookie jar it's best to just fess up.
"They were first added after 300 A.D. But the Laodicean Council rejected them in 363 as being uninspired. The Vatican Version of Scripture of the 4th century."
You are calling me a liar. I do not know where that website is, have never visited it, nor do I have any interest in visiting it. Perhaps that website took information from a study Bible. All I know is I have a study Bible in front of me, and I do NOT lie.
Well, then, smvoice obviously learned something new.
Why not give him the benefit of the doubt then and accept what he said as the truth?
Why the implication that he’s lying just because you found something different and knew about it. It doesn’t mean everybody knows something just because you do.
For a minute, I was so angry that I forgot the purpose of the questions to you. That creeds change as the word of God changes. NO WAIT THAT ISN'T CORRECT. HIS WORD NEVER CHANGES. It's MEN who change His word in order to deceive. And form new, improved creeds for all the itching ears in the audience.
I've posted this to you, so a reply would be expected. Otherwise, begone. You may accuse others of things, but you will not accuse me unjustly.
smvoice, if quoting or paraphrasing another website, be sure to include the source link or information so that the moderators can check copyright restrictions.