Well, then, smvoice obviously learned something new.
Why not give him the benefit of the doubt then and accept what he said as the truth?
Why the implication that he’s lying just because you found something different and knew about it. It doesn’t mean everybody knows something just because you do.
Calling it the truth is overly generous. It was significantly flawed AND DIRECTLY QUOTED without attribution. Besides, when was the last time any of you gave a Catholic the benefit of the doubt?