Replies

You have a serious reading comprehension problem. I characterized the statement, not the person.

Read it again.

I said:

I don't know how to characterize the statement.

Now read it again. "The Statement" was what was being described.

The problem is that you have absolutely horrible reading comprehension, and an almost non-existent understand of basic grammar.

Caww might be a very fine person, I don't have any idea. But the statement was, AND IS, a deranged statement.

But let me be very, very clear, just so there's no more reading comprehension problems. I will absolutely under no circumstances apologize for the statement, which was 100% accurate!

Hatred for billions of people whom you've never met, who's only personality trait that you know of is that they practice a different religion, is deranged. I would describe it as bordering on mental illness.

So let's recap one more time:

Judging an individual based on their actions = good.

Judging billions of people collectively based on their religious differences = bad.

Is that clear enough for you Paco?

Caww might be a very fine person, I don't have any idea. But the statement was, AND IS, a deranged statement.

That's correct..you have no idea, not even close.

My statement was not deranged in the least bit. It stands on the knowlege of understanding what evil is and those who permote it's teachings.

We know what Islam is...they are straight forward about who they are and their beliefs. Mormons hide under the mask of deception and falsehood. But both have agendas that are not in the interest of this country but of their political agenda.....and those agendas are indeed evil....as well as there leaderships who promte them.

So you don’t see how people who devoutly believe and practice an EVIL religion could possibly be evil themselves?

Regarding Mormons, I have been there, I know what lies underneath that ‘clean, wholesome’ exterior. I know their motives because I know what they are taught their motives are to be.

You couldn’t possibly understand unless you’ve been there.

I said: I don't know how to characterize the statement. Now read it again. "The Statement" was what was being described.

(Nice parsing...after all, it is people who make statements...statements don't materialize on their own...unless you're talking about the book of Daniel in the Old Testament...where the ruler literally saw the "handwriting on the wall"...so unless you're talking about a "handwriting on the wall" situation...sorry...people utter statements)

Not sure if you're competitive yet with Clintonian kinds of parsing...like...that depends upon what the meaning of the word is is...