NL what’s your explanation for the 101 natural clocks that differ greatly with the only ones for long ages?
1.) Starlight - see my prior post.
2.) Radioactive decay rates - when anomolies and assumptions are clearly stated this dating method leaves a lot to be desired. Logic dictates it must be abandoned rather than explain the other 101 clocks problems.
3.) Fossil and geologic sediment layers aging method uses circular logic to point back to the each other for age verification.
The history of mankind and all his understanding leaves the door wide open for mis-interpretations of all God’s Laws for each and every generation so stop saying “God does not lie” and then completely contradict his very Word - the Holy Bible.
So-called "natural clocks" are merely phenomena that keep time in some way as an incidental characteristic. Physics does not suggest a uniformly linear time scale nor are any of the known natural clocks are immune from variation from external stimuli.
Can you point to any statistically supported Measurement System Analysis performed on any of these natural clocks based upon an absolute starting condition? I didn’t think so. Remember, that the orbital and rotational frequencies of the earth are natural clocks that also have considerable variation and their initial states are largely theoretical.
People of faith should not be afraid that science is challenging the authority of the Bible. Science only reveals the greatness of God’s creation demonstrated in its precision and complexity.