So-called "natural clocks" are merely phenomena that keep time in some way as an incidental characteristic. Physics does not suggest a uniformly linear time scale nor are any of the known natural clocks are immune from variation from external stimuli.
Can you point to any statistically supported Measurement System Analysis performed on any of these natural clocks based upon an absolute starting condition? I didn’t think so. Remember, that the orbital and rotational frequencies of the earth are natural clocks that also have considerable variation and their initial states are largely theoretical.
People of faith should not be afraid that science is challenging the authority of the Bible. Science only reveals the greatness of God’s creation demonstrated in its precision and complexity.
Now don’t have a cow man -
but true science agrees w/ God’s word.
Not contradiction but confirmation!
You're just saying that because it's true.
Your fancy way of saying none of the clocks agree nor are entirely accurate is still disingenous.
None of your preferred clocks are even in the same ballpark as the 101 in my link. Furthermore Mt. St. Helens showed hod badly your clock can be wrong w the blind radioactive dating that was performed after the 1980 eruption there.