Replies

It’s dangerous to try to justify, explain away, or overlook the abominable attitude of today’s church leaders as regards the cooperation and so called “interfaith dialogue” between different religions.

Pope Benedict met leaders of non-Christian faiths in London on Friday (September 17, 2010) and stressed the need for dialogue among religions to foster peace. Britain’s Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks and Khaled Azzam, director of the Prince’s School of Traditional Arts, also spoke.

Here are some excerpts from the pope’s speech:

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/09/17/text-excerpts-from-pope-speech-at-london-interfaith-meeting/

We can find article after article of not only the Catholics but every other denomination and religion promoting the same “interfaith dialogue” nonsense. If you justify, deny, or try to explain away the so called “cooperation” and acceptance of other religions you may want to try to explain how it relates to the following verse and other parts of scripture.

2 John 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. 10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: 11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

If you don’t recognize the spiral religion is in today towards a one world religion in virtually every denomination you had better step back and think again.

I am talking specifically about the false link of a "shiva priestess". specifically. That is incorrect as:

there is no such thing as a shiva priestess -- the shaivate purohits/pandits are still exclusively male Brahmins, even in the progressive states like Kerala
the woman in question was a Christian, an Indian Christian
She was wearing an Indian dress -- a sari
She was putting a tikka on the pope's head, no religious significance but a cultural one

Thank you for the ping, but I have decided to ignore any further comments from this thread. The issue is the rise of Chrislam, and there will be Catholic Priests whowill get involved with this demonic push. But the thread was heading in the direction of a Catholic dog fight and I’ve had my fill of Catholic bashing, so I didn’t want to pay any more attention to a thread headed in that direction, with a rabid defender going overboard.