It’s not disingenuous to point out that your post shows homosexuality in the priesthood/bishopric to be the end result of doctrinal or traditional compromise.
You offered no explanation for the occurrences of homosexuality in the Catholic priesthood/bishopric
It could be argued that at least with Anglicans, you can identify which of the priests are homosexual
will
It was disingenuous of your post to make it seem like an attack on Anglicans. They sadly show what can happen when one takes the one small step away from orthodoxy