Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2011 6:53:12 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: narses; Elendur; it_ürür; Bockscar; Mary Kochan; Bed_Zeppelin; YellowRoseofTx; Rashputin; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


2 posted on 06/14/2011 6:54:01 AM PDT by narses ("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
So, this is the other James, called in Scripture James the less:

No, the James cited as the Lord's brother (who wrote the book of James) was not one of the 12.

He was the James of 1 Cor 15 who came to the Lord later...

3 posted on 06/14/2011 7:00:12 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
Denis Keohane is obviously reading from the Semper Virgo Translation of the Bible, where, for example in Matthew 12:48-50, it has Jesus replying:

"Who is my mother, and who are my cousins or stepfather's children from a previous marriage? Here are my mother and my cousins or stepfather's children from a previous marriage. For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my cousin or stepfather's son or daughter from a previous marriage, and mother."

I prefer the King James version.

7 posted on 06/14/2011 7:22:45 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Please send some Alka-Seltzer to my FRiend Quix ...


10 posted on 06/14/2011 7:28:18 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
I appreciate the case you presented. Very impressed. Without studying it for myself, you seem to make a convincing argument, BUT, LOL no “but”.

Even if your position is correct, which it seems to be, what difference does it make? How are you defining virginity? Do you mean Joseph never had sex with Mary after the birth of Jesus? Hard to believe and why would it matter that he did? I think this is the point you start to vere off into “Mary worship”.

You made a good point about the people mentioned as not being siblings of Jesus. This still doesn't mean he didn't have any other siblings. Also it doesn't really prove your idea of “The Perpetual Virginity of Mary”. You only addressed some claims against the idea.

If I claim that the temperature in hell is 99 degrees, just because you can't “prove” I'm wrong, doesn't make me right.

16 posted on 06/14/2011 7:38:16 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

We really don’t need to keep beating on it because the question is just not that important to us. It distracts from the Gospel message of redemption through the Grace of God - which is what all Brothers and Sisters in Christ should be proclaiming to the lost world.


18 posted on 06/14/2011 7:46:53 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Absolutely great article.


25 posted on 06/14/2011 9:07:35 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Too long to take in all at once, so I’ll comment only on the supposed debunking of “James”.

The problem with the argument is that there is nothing to tie “James the Less” to “James the brother of Jesus”. There is no indication that Jesus’ brothers were disciples. So proving that James the Less wasn’t Mary’s son doesn’t prove anything, because James the Less isn’t named as Jesus’ brother.


26 posted on 06/14/2011 9:09:25 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
The Perpetual Virginity of Mary - Brothers and Sisters of Christ?
Virgin Birth—or Prophetic Slip?
The Perpetual Virginity of Blessed Mary
Aeiparthenos (An Anglo-Catholic Priest on Mary's Perpetual Virginity)
[Why I Am Catholic]: Because of the Protestant Reformers Beliefs On Mary
Catholic Biblical Apologetics: Mary: Virgin and Ever Virgin
Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary
Luther, Calvin, and Other Early Protestants on the Perpetual Virginity of Mary
The Protestant Reformers on the Virgin Mary
Zwingli’s’ Mariology: On Mary “Full of Grace”
28 posted on 06/14/2011 9:15:11 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Thanks for the ping to this excellent article, and some really good Catholic posts.


49 posted on 06/14/2011 10:24:32 AM PDT by Judith Anne ( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

Thanks narses, good thread, good posters.


57 posted on 06/14/2011 11:18:23 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

A very great post. It’s so clear and easy to understand; if you’re not fighting it.


89 posted on 06/14/2011 6:19:00 PM PDT by Melian ("I can't spare this [wo]man; [s]he fights!" (Apologies to Abe Lincoln) Go, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses

I have always figured that marys husband had maybe been married before and had children much older than Jesus, but after reading the comment it really does make sense, at any rate i think we can be assured that Jesus was mary,s only child.


John ch 19
25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.

26 When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!

27 Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.


The reason for this was that mary had no one to care for her,
if she had other children jesus would have had no reason to appoint John to care for her.


106 posted on 06/15/2011 5:50:27 AM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: narses
Facts in regard to Our Lady

Her progenitors were chosen and guided by the Holy Spirit

Her mother, (Saint) Anne was made aware that her daughter, Mary, was the one chosen to Immaculately conceive, and carry in her womb, the infant Jesus, the Redeemer.

From the moment of her conception, Mary was and remained pure, innocent, and without sin.

After the 'announcement' from Gabriel, Mary only desired to be 'married' to God.

Obeying God's wishes, she married (Saint) Joseph.

Mary was an adept seamstress, and oft made clothes to be given to the poor. When women would request a garment sewn by Mary, solely for the sake of owning such a garment, she politely refused.

Mary died thirteen years and two months after Christ's Ascension.

Before she died, all the Apostles, excepting Thomas, who arrived after her death, were present.

Before dying, Mary blessed each Apostle according to Divine instruction.

Mary was interred in a cave which was situated below the cave of Jesus' interment.

Upon death Mary"s soul ascended immediately to Paradise.

Later, her spirit, accompanied by Angels, collected her human body and again ascended to Heaven, where Mary joined her Son and the Father.

Mary, by decree of God, was named Mother of the Church.

Ave Maria.

Aside: Many will scoff at, and attempt to deny, what I've posted above. If you do not believe it now, you will at some point in the future, be shown it to be true.
Also, we, Roman-Catholics, do not 'worship' Maria. Though we do, unabashedly, love her, and oft ask that she intercedes on our behalf to her Son.

229 posted on 06/18/2011 6:36:51 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson