Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rwilson99
Jesus’ instructions to John to take care of Mary, as his mother, upon his crucifixion seem to imply that Mary had no other children.

Isn't there a more straightforward explanation? None of his brothers believed in Him and were not at the crucifixion, John WAS there.

174 posted on 06/14/2011 7:00:34 AM PDT by dartuser ("Dealing with preterists is like cleaning the litter box ... but at least none of the cats are big.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: dartuser
Isn't there a more straightforward explanation? None of his brothers believed in Him and were not at the crucifixion, John WAS there.

Incorrect, if your brothers (assumption) thought you were nuts (assumption again), and you died a criminal, that still doesn't mean that it's ok to leave the care of your widowed mother to a friend rather than to them

It's not "nice" NOW and then it would have been something a religious Jew like Jesus would never do.

So, Jesus telling John to take care of Mary as his Mother tells you that He had no other brethern with Mary as their mother.

175 posted on 06/14/2011 7:09:11 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrząszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego słynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson