[sand lake bar]

My claim in post 89 is self evident from the material that the Mormo-phobes keep posting. Those who read the threads are already familiar with it. No need for me to re-post.

[svcw]

You have no example, nuff said.

[Turtlepower]

If someone presents a viewpoint that is contary to truth, are you suggesting that noone should challenge the contrary viewpoint?

Do you follow the same philosphy when it comes to political discussions (i.e., noone should counter liberal’s lying statements)?

Do you consider yourself the arbitrator of truth? How are the rest of us supposed to know when it’s proper, in your mind, for us to engage in debates?

[Elsie]

My claim in post 89 is self evident from the material that the Mormo-phobes keep posting.

---

Instructions given by Joseph Smith:

          "Doctrine & Covenants" Section 129:
1  There are two kinds of beings in heaven, namely: Angels, who are resurrected personages, having bodies of flesh and bones;
2  For instance, Jesus said: Handle me and see, for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. 
3  Secondly: the spirits of just men made perfect, they who are not resurrected, but inherit the same glory. 
4  When a messenger comes saying he has a message from God, offer him your hand and request him to shake hands with you. 
5  If he be an angel he will do so, and you will feel his hand. 
6  If he be the spirit of a just man made perfect he will come in his glory; for that is the only way he can appear;
7  Ask him to shake hands with you, but he will not move, because it is contrary to the order of heaven for a just man to deceive; but he will still deliver his message. 
8  If it be the devil as an angel of light, when you ask him to shake hands he will offer you his hand, and you will not feel anything; you may therefore detect him. 
9  These are three grand keys whereby you may know whether any administration is from God.

Joseph Smith,   Nauvoo, Illinois,   February 9, 1843.   History of the Church 5:267

[Elsie]

No need for me to re-post.

Your Honor, SLB is refering to a trial that was held last year, but has NO evidence for THIS one.

What say ye?

Mistrial or no?