Skip to comments.
Faith and Freedom showdown: Palin v. Bachmann
The Washington Post's On Faith ^
| June 7, 2011
| Sally Quinn
Posted on 06/07/2011 7:43:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Move over Sarah Palin. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) is stealing your thunder. (And I dont mean Rolling Thunder.)
At this weekends Faith and Freedom Conference in Washington, Bachmann brought the house down. In a crowd of devoted religious conservatives, Bachmann hit all the right buttons and had the crowd screaming, clapping and on their feet.
While Palin was on her private vacation bus tour (in fact, her 10 year old Piper said to a reporter, Thanks for ruining our vacation.) Bachmann was looking and talking like a serious candidate for the presidency. Every Republican presidential hopeful and most Republican political leaders showed up at the conference, organized by Ralph Reed, the former head of the Christian Coalition.
Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Jon Huntsman, Ron Paul, Herman Cain and Bachmann addressed the gathering. Newt Gingrich sent a video as he was on vacation. House Speaker John Boehner and Rep. Eric Cantor were there. Even The Donald couldnt resist a cameo appearance. Palin, who was invited, was the only no-show.
Big mistake, Sarah. You should have been there. You just kissed off your base.
Now I know that Palin and Bachmann say they are friends. They have to. And they say they dont see any competition from each other. But if Palin really is considering a run she is going to be in for a shock, because from the point of view of the very religious Christian right, Bachmann beats Palin in every category: Family values? Both have large biological families, but Bachmann has also 23 foster children.
Right to life? Palin is anti-abortion and calls it murder. Yet she was lauded for her honesty in admitting she actually considered the procedure when she was pregnant with her last child, a Downs Syndrome baby....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; bachmann; enemedia; hatemachine; leftspew; michelebachmann; palin; pds; quinn4msromney; quinn4rinos; quinn4romneyskank; romneyspew; romneystalkinghorse; sallyquinn; sarahpalin; waronbachmann; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: GlockLady
Yeah, the movie will rock. Question: Why is it assumed that Palin and Bachmann must have their own mini-primary?
61
posted on
06/07/2011 11:04:48 PM PDT
by
HMS Surprise
(Chris Christie can go to hell.)
To: Bigtigermike
Well, Jesus did tell Judas what you do, do quickly. (John 13:27). So I guess backstabber Bachmann is quickly doing those things that is necessary against Palin Bachmann is Judas to Palin's Christ? You are certifiable!
62
posted on
06/07/2011 11:06:46 PM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(No coronations in 2012 please.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Bachmann camp should STFU
To: newzjunkey
It’s a joke, relax Francis! Sheesh
To: newzjunkey
That is not the first time that the palin groupies here have referred to her as Christ.
65
posted on
06/08/2011 5:08:23 AM PDT
by
wtc911
("How you gonna get down that hill?")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And apparently, Bachmann is June’s pick for the MSM’s “not Palin” flavor of the month.
66
posted on
06/08/2011 5:11:25 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(Palin's detractors now resort to "nobody believes she can win because nobody believes she can win")
To: Colonel Kangaroo
I just want a somebody elected wholl end Roe v Wade and the legalized death industry....
________________________________________
Then palin might not be your girl...the following is from a 2008 interview...
"Q: Do you think theres an inherent right to privacy in the Constitution?
A: I do. Yeah, I do.
Q: The cornerstone of Roe v. Wade.
A: I do. And I believe that individual states can best handle what the people within the different constituencies in the 50 states would like to see their will ushered in an issue like that."
Her oft stated objection to RvW is not the fact that abortion is murder but that the decision should be made at the state level.
67
posted on
06/08/2011 5:17:06 AM PDT
by
wtc911
("How you gonna get down that hill?")
To: Mariner
“Big mistake, Sarah. You should have been there. You just kissed off your base.”
While Palin is both formidable and adorable, it baffles me when folks refer to her base as the evangelical voter.
It’s because the woman who wrote the article has no clue about anything concerning Palin except that she is extremely jealous of her accomplishments and how she got where she got. Hard work and determination. Check out Sally Quinn and see how she got where she got.
68
posted on
06/08/2011 6:07:14 AM PDT
by
curth
(Organize4Palin.com - NOW IS THE TIME)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sally Quinn won't be voting for either of them, so let's get that straight.
69
posted on
06/08/2011 6:37:07 AM PDT
by
MNnice
To: alstewartfan
Sarah's explanation for her support of LOST is that it would protect Alaska's access to Artic energy resources. At least one conservative pro-sovereignty group has written her a letter explaining how LOST is not needed to do this and that it represents a serious threat to national sovereignty. The assessment that LOST represents a MAJOR threat to national sovereignty is shared by every major conservative organization that has weighed in on the issue. They forced the hand of the candidates running in the GOP Primary and every one of them came out against it. Even McCain reversed his earlier support for it. Sarah has expressed her support for this more than once.
She also signed a Climate Change order the same year that she sent that letter of support for LOST to Alaska's Senate delegation. That order contained a lot of verbiage that you often hear from the environmentalist movement, including support for "regional" carbon registries and carbon caps. Such things require a sovereign body to enforce. When asked in the VP debates about whether she supports carbon caps her response was that she does:
Q: Let me clear something up: Sen. McCain has said he supports caps on carbon emissions. Sen. Obama has said he supports clean coal technology, which I dont believe youve always supported. Do you support capping carbon emissions?
PALIN: I do. I do.
PALIN: I was the first governor to form a climate change sub-cabinet to start dealing with the impacts. Weve got to reduce emissions. John McCain is right there with an all of the above approach to deal with climate change impacts. As we rely more on other countries that dont care as much about the climate as we do, were allowing them to produce and to emit and even pollute more than America would ever stand for. Its all the more reason that we have an all of the above approach, tapping into alternative sources of energy and conserving fuel, conserving our petroleum products and our hydrocarbons so that we can clean up this planet.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Joe Biden Oct 2, 2008
If the problem with other countries is that "were allowing them to produce and to emit and even pollute more than America would ever stand for", the implied solution is that there should be some authority that would not allow them to do so. Couple this with her support for LOST and I have serious questions about whether she understands the fundamental concerns associated with National Sovereignty.
As for Michele hiring someone who criticized Palin, that is politics. Palin supporters have been criticizing Michele as well. This does not worry me because campaign operatives handle the nuts and bolts of running a campaign, not the forming of policy. My concern with Sarah is on the policy level. She is on record for.... the L.O.S.T. Treaty, Carbon Credits, a Windfall profits Tax, Amnesty, registration which is the prelude to amnesty, and endorsed by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. She was also a major supporter of the "Bridge to Nowhere" and did not reverse course on this position until it became a national embarrassment and Congress cut off funding for it.
I have no such policy concerns with Michele.
70
posted on
06/08/2011 8:46:38 AM PDT
by
rob777
To: rob777
She also called bankers *who were forced to give bad loans* “predatory lenders” in speeches *for McCain*. NOW she’s speaking *for herself*. Much easier job, IMO. Bob
71
posted on
06/08/2011 9:25:47 AM PDT
by
alstewartfan
(When you're fresh out of lawyers, you don't know how good it's gonna feel! Al Stewart)
To: rob777
Palin “is on record for.... the L.O.S.T. Treaty, Carbon Credits, a Windfall profits Tax, Amnesty, registration which is the prelude to amnesty, and endorsed by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. She was also a major supporter of the “Bridge to Nowhere” and did not reverse course on this position until it became a national embarrassment and Congress cut off funding for it.
I have no such policy concerns with Michele.”
BTTT
72
posted on
06/08/2011 9:53:23 AM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
*yawn*
It’s confusing really, Bachmann is ruining her legacy. She could have been mounting up to be a legit, powerful senator oh well.
PRESIDENT PALIN 2012!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson