Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law; HarleyD; boatbums; Quix; metmom

I certainly did answer that, as well as show you that your charge of ignorance is on your part. You seem to have firewall that prevents you from reading or comprehending what answers and refutes your premise and statements, including when it is from RC sources, and from understanding the deeper implications of a theological issue.


192 posted on 05/28/2011 5:47:36 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( "Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out," Acts 3:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212
"I certainly did answer that,

No, you didn't/ It doesn't require paragraphs of irrelevant clippings and portentously assembled blather, a simple yes or no will suffice. Do you have the gift of infallibility? I just need to know if you expect everyone to unconditionally believe you or to simply take your interpretations as an opinion.

Are you asserting your interpretations are infallible?

198 posted on 05/28/2011 6:57:46 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
Two words...plausible deniability. ;o)
222 posted on 05/28/2011 9:36:11 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson