Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are we seeing the Drought mentioned in the Book of Joel that heralds the Day of the Lord?
RITA ^ | May 14th, 2011

Posted on 05/14/2011 10:57:12 AM PDT by TaraP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-278 next last
To: GiovannaNicoletta
I've spent a great deal of time discussing and debating with your group.

Check with your leader.

I'm not going to spend a long time rehashing what I've gone over repeatedly in all of these recent “end of times” threads.

If you don't like it - tough. I'm sure it will help your ego to feel like your being persecuted. Seems that's what you all live for.

That, and hoping for a quick and devastating world wide catastrophe.

241 posted on 05/17/2011 4:21:47 PM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: airborne
Check with your leader.

I wasn't aware that I had a leader. Who is my leader?

I'm not going to spend a long time rehashing what I've gone over repeatedly in all of these recent “end of times” threads.

And after all that you've "gone over", you can't come up with one example of my flawed interpretation?

If you don't like it - tough. I'm sure it will help your ego to feel like your being persecuted. Seems that's what you all live for.

LOL- you're the one who can't take being called out on what you post on this forum. I don't care one way or the other. Scoffers and mockers of Bible prophecy are a dime a dozen and Jesus Christ told His people that they would be around right before His return. And, as usual, He is absolutely right. And persecution? There are no Christians in this country who are persecuted. Being laughed at is not persecution - it is something to be glad about because it is something that happened to our Savior first and if it's happening to us, then we're hitting some nerves. And, again, having to deal with mockers means that Christ is returning soon. I wouldn't call that persecution.

That, and hoping for a quick and devastating world wide catastrophe.

Got any examples?

242 posted on 05/17/2011 4:33:31 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Your sect’s perversions can get you into trouble.

Just like I said on many prior occasions.


243 posted on 05/17/2011 6:03:52 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

Interesting profile page.


244 posted on 05/17/2011 6:20:34 PM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Evidently the doctors during the colonoscopy drilled too high. Have you gone to the ophthalmologist lately? I wrote
giovanna it's the same supernatural, demonic hatred that propels the Muslim nations to vow to wipe Israel off the map.

My THREE cents :)

  1. Why do Moslem nations vow? To divert attention away from their own failures and blame their problems on the jooos!

  2. Why do Moslem jihadis vow? Because any Moslem land is Moslem land forever according to them -- hence their aims for Al Andalus and their reluctance to give up Ayodhya

  3. Why do Moslem moderates vow? Because of hidden point 2 and also they say "ooh, poor Palis, they were thrown out of their land" -- completely of course neglecting that many were immigrants in the late 1800s and that many stayed in Israel and ignoring the attacks on Pali immigrants in other Arab countries and attacks on Christians in the ME

This is not supernatural.

hint -- you can enlarge the font, but the problem is when certain quixotical posters start seeing little men in long beards and top hats everywhere (don't look behind you now)
245 posted on 05/18/2011 12:50:07 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Quix; wolfcreek; Notwithstanding
Cronos: *talks about how 9/11 toother are believers in a fantasy that is logically, factually and in every other way utterly false, with no grounding or basis"

quix: You have every reason to know that’s a forbidden topic.

Why is it forbidden to make fun of such knee-jerk anti-Americans that make up fantastical stories like this? Any idiot who believes in this truf has holes in his brain. What do you say wolfcreek, notw? -- as I said, if you look at 9/11 incredibly sceptically and cynically you cannot see the hand of anyone but the Moslem jihadis in it -- you cannot see anyone but the Moslem jihadis behind it.

It's unbelievable that anyone would believe this kind of garbage that has no factual proof -- it's just like the crazies who believe in little green men from Mars who did colon probes on them

246 posted on 05/18/2011 12:55:57 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01; Quix
I had the somber opportunity to stand in the rebuilt part of the Pentagon and I had the view of where that plane came in. It hit a tower and knocked it down. It wasn't a fricking missile. No offense to Quix, but truthers are crazy

I agree. I wasn't there on 9/11 and even after didn't have the close-up opportunity as you did, but even on telly, it's frickin' obvious two PLANES hit.

Furthermore, follow the trail -- how could this have possibly benefited any Western government (forget about the US, forget about republicans) -- I can't see how this in hindsight or EVEN AT THAT POINT IN TIME benefited anyone but the jihadis (of course, it helped the jihadis get to their 72 devils quickly, but that's about it).

Logically and factually the position of the 9/11 trufers is utterly baseless.

247 posted on 05/18/2011 2:00:50 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson; Quix
And that is because it is such a riduclous claim that Bush and Cheney bombed the towers as to not even deserve the attention of experts. Therefore, the claims can not be taken seriously unless there is a debate and there is no debate about it. There is only one side born of the far Left’s and Muslim’s Bush Derangement Syndrome.

True, but even if you take that as a premise, there are no facts and no benefits to it. it's just another baseless conspiracy theory

248 posted on 05/18/2011 2:04:34 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: marbren; Religion Moderator
Nice try, no comment, except that I have never been a truther so stop the slander.

I never said you were and haven't seen you posting anything on this, so don't know one way or the other. What my post did talk about was how illogical the trufers position is

249 posted on 05/18/2011 2:06:17 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Apparently, one man’s crazy conspiracy theory is another man’s zealous, fervent religious belief.

And apparently, if I, as a Christian, don’t buy into said far out theories, I am accused of persecuting those who do.


250 posted on 05/18/2011 4:02:33 AM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: airborne
And apparently, if I, as a Christian, don’t buy into said far out theories, I am accused of persecuting those who do.

Yes, you said it. The way the traditional conspiracy theorists have gone about telling you that "Your charity and understanding of complex realities are both . . . extremely underwhelming." and " it's about all who deny Scripture and mock and ridicule." etc shows that they can't argue with what you say....

251 posted on 05/18/2011 4:09:18 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

But they do indeed argue. Just without the need for facts.

Kind of funny, in a sad sort of way.


252 posted on 05/18/2011 4:11:56 AM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: TruthConquers; Quix; Cronos; airborne; SaraJohnson; Joya; marbren
Thanks for pointing this out. The *details* of how radical Islam managed to hijack 4 of our planes (3 of them successfully completing their missions), seems to of evaded certain folks memories.

I hope the owner/Mods see through any veiled attempts by some to get folks banned from this site.

253 posted on 05/18/2011 4:29:26 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
The “radical” Islam you speak of isn't so radical in the land where it is promoted and payed for.

Saudi Arabia.

But we kiss their sorry butts instead of drilling our own vast oil fields.

Allow them to pollute the world with their cult of death, so these pitiful human beings don't turn their attention on their real slave masters - the House of Saud.

254 posted on 05/18/2011 4:33:44 AM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: airborne; Cronos
Whatever happened to inquiring minds? Alternative thinking? classic debate?

Oh yea, stomped to death by Political Correctness.

255 posted on 05/18/2011 4:34:18 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Not here.

Not yet.


256 posted on 05/18/2011 4:37:00 AM PDT by airborne (Paratroopers! Good to the last drop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Alternative thinking? classic debate?

To give them due credit, I've never seen these folks indulging in logical debate or read facts. They prefer conspiracy theories with no facts.

257 posted on 05/18/2011 4:37:31 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: airborne

That would be correct but, can it be connected with ‘Able Danger’ or any breakdowns in intelligence gathering on our part?


258 posted on 05/18/2011 4:50:13 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Ever get the feeling that the powers that be would just as soon have us forget all about 9-11 and go on about our business?

I wrote my senior paper in HS on the Warren Report. I’ve seen how far *interested* parties will go to smooth over the rough edges.


259 posted on 05/18/2011 4:55:09 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

I think that would lead to the same problem that LEAD to 9/11 — ignorance. If we had kept on the ball in 1993 and see the Taliban coming to power, hijacking that indian aircraft, etc. as signs, we could have prevented 911


260 posted on 05/18/2011 5:10:49 AM PDT by Cronos (Libspeak: "Yes there is proof. And no, for the sake of privacy I am not posting it here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson