I didn’t shorten anything. I gave you the dictionary definitions of the word. A monarchy IS absolute sovereignty, and subsequently is autarchy. There are no differences.
There’s nothing sloppy about it. You’re lying to yourself pretending that monarchies aren’t dictatorships, I’m putting forth the truth. All monarchies are dictatorships, period, end of sentence, saying otherwise is denying historical truth.
Good things might come from God but dictatorships aren’t good things. Just because somebody crowned himself in a cathedral doesn’t mean God approved. And it doesn’t mean that anything Frederick II did was in obedience to the will of God. Here you’re piling assumptions upon faith none of which have any relationship to the historical facts of dictators calling themselves kings blessed by God. Out here in reality we don’t know if God likes a particular leader or if that particular leader is following God’s will. All we know is whether or not they’re a dictator. And if they’re a monarch they’re a dictator, again period end of sentence plain historical fact.
It’s not childish, it’s the truth. Again let’s look at the dictionary, venereal:
arising from, connected with, or transmitted through sexual intercourse, as an infection.
And how does a monarchy continue? That’s right, by the right person having sex and begetting the next generation of dictator. Which means it is venereal transfer of power.
Autarchies are dictatorships. Let’s spread out to the thesaurus this time:
Synonyms: autocracy, despotism, dictatorship, monocracy, totalitarianism, tyrannical rule, tyranny
Not a lot of freedom in that list. You’re right about one thing, words do mean things. And the words you’re using mean dictatorship. I know the words very well, if there’s somebody here that needs to do some learning it’s the guy that thinks monarchies make freedom.
Please substantiate your theory given the difference between the two that I outlined in 263.