[aruanan]

That is, she wants to have her polemical cake and eat it, too.

That statement is also against the rules of the religion forum because it's a type of "mind-reading."

And finally, you are dragging an argument from one thread to another, even from one forum to another.

And that's against the rules of the religion forum.

You're three for three, aruanan.

This thread is about pederast priests raping children and the church that harbors and promotes them. Do you have anything to say about the topic of this thread?

Actually, I was answering a particular question. So let me rephrase the subsequent remark, "That is, certain people give all indications of wanting to have their polemical cake and eat it, too."

There, no mind-reading.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

let me rephrase the subsequent remark, "That is, certain people give all indications of wanting to have their polemical cake and eat it, too."

How does that relate to this thread and the article above?