To: Dr. Eckleburg; Religion Moderator; Natural Law
Likewise, because Catholics read Paul and James, I have requested that the sola fide be taken off of
this thread3 posted on
02/26/2011 10:43:40 AM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Natural Law
That thread also contains these words:
Words with Different Meanings
So it should not remain a sola fide caucus
4 posted on
02/26/2011 10:46:12 AM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Salvation; Religion Moderator; Natural Law; Gamecock; Alex Murphy
This thread explicitly breaks the caucus rule.
Your comparison to the Paul/James thread is specious. That thread does not discuss Roman Catholicism.
This thread's stated purpose is to compare "differences between Catholics/Protestants viewpoints."
Are you and Natural Law unfamiliar with the rules stated on the Religion Moderator's homepage...?
"The “caucus” article and posts must not compare beliefs or speak in behalf of a belief outside the caucus."This is just about the most grievous example ever posted breaking the caucus designation rules.
8 posted on
02/26/2011 10:56:25 AM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Salvation; Dr. Eckleburg; Natural Law; Religion Moderator
Likewise, because Catholics read Paul and James, I have requested that the sola fide be taken off of this thread
Salvation, that's such a weak argument that it should be seen as argumentative. The Sola Fide article does not once reference Catholics, Catholicism, Orthodox, or anything of the like.
It would be like my saying that the Catholics can't have an "Assumption of Mary" Caucus, because our bibles also contain Mary.
18 posted on
02/26/2011 11:10:39 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson